Dismissed

K.Baburaj v. The Managing Director

Madras HC26 Jul 2021WP/9262/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ petition filed for reinstatement. The court noted that a connected writ petition filed by the Management regarding the same issue was allowed and remanded, rendering the current petition's relief inexecutable.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as the relief sought could not be granted due to the allowance and remand of a connected petition filed by the Management.

K.Baburaj Vs The Managing Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 26.07.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN

W.P. No.9262 of 2021

K.Baburaj

... Petitioner

..Vs..

The Managing Director, The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Limited, “Pallavan House”, P.B.Bo.390, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶10

Senior Deputy Manager, The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Limited, “Pallavan House”, P.B.No.390, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶11

The Special Deputy Labour Commissioner, Labour Commissionerate, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

¶12

The Branch Manager, The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Limited,

¶13

Avadi Bus Depot, Chennai – 600 054. ...Respondent

¶14

Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1^st respondent herein to reinstate the petitioner in service with continuity of service and all other attendant benefits and also to provide duty to me with any reasonable time.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.M.Chidambaram for R1 to R4

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction to the 1^st respondent herein to reinstate the petitioner in service with continuity of service and all other attendant benefits, by allotting a duty to him.

¶19

The connected Writ Petition filed by the Management in W.P.No.9696 of 2021 has been allowed by this Court today and the matter was remanded to the Approval Authority for fresh consideration. The relief sought for by the petitioner in this Writ Petition cannot be granted. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

s/d-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶24

dpq To

¶25

The Managing Director, The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Limited, “Pallavan House”, P.B.Bo.390, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶26

Senior Deputy Manager, The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Limited, “Pallavan House”, P.B.No.390, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶27

The Special Deputy Labour Commissioner, Labour Commissionerate, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

¶28

The Branch Manager, The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Limited, Avadi Bus Depot, Chennai – 600 054.

¶29

W.P.No.9262 of 2021

¶30

SRA(CO) SP(28/10/2021)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Baburaj v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Baburaj v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Assistant Provident Fund Vs M/S.Gtk Textiles Pvt. Ltd.

Tirunelveli District Central Vs the Presiding Officer

M/S.Ica (Madras) Private Ltd, Vs the Presiding Officer

The Management, Vs The Presiding Officer

The Management Vs The Presiding Officer

The Management Vs The Special Joint Commissioner of Labour