The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking a writ of certiorari and quashing of an order dated 08.03.1996 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court found the prayer infructuous and dismissed the petitions accordingly.
Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
W.P.Nos.9131 to 9134 of 2009
Lakshmi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.9131 of 2009
Selvi Valliammal @ Pattammal
... Petitioner in W.P.No.9132 of 2009
Vibushan @ Krishnan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.9133 of 2009
Selvam ... Petitioner in W.P.No.9134 of 2009
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Krishnagiri District,
Krishnagiri.
2.The Tahsildar,
Krishnagiri Taluk,
Krishnagiri District.
3.The Land Acquisition Officer/
Special Tahsildar (Harijan Welfare),
Krishnagiri Taluk and District.
... Respondents in all petitions
Common Prayer: Petition filed Under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari,
to call for the entire records of the third respondent in
pursuance of the order in Thirpoo No.1-1995-96
Na.Ka.No.1262/94 dated 08.03.1996 and to quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.G.Krishnamoorthy
(In all W.Ps)
For Respondents : Mr.M.Elumalai
(In all W.Ps) Additional Government Pleader
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ that the prayer in the writ petitions has become infructuous.
2.Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No Costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
tta
Copy to
1.The District Collector,
Krishnagiri District,
Krishnagiri.
2.The Tahsildar,
Krishnagiri Taluk,
Krishnagiri District.
3.The Land Acquisition Officer/
Special Tahsildar (Harijan Welfare),
Krishnagiri Taluk and District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.6797
W.P.Nos.9131 to 9134 of 2009
AJB(CO)
CB(02/03/2021)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions which sought quashing of a specific order are infructuous due to absence of records/primer.
Whether the petitions under Article 226 invoking a writ of certiorari are maintainable at the present stage.
Whether the writ petitions need to be disposed of as infructuous and dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakshmi
Selvi Valliammal @ Pattammal
Vibushan @ Krishnan
Selvam
The District Collector
The Tahsildar
S.S.SUNDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
