Dismissed

Central Organisation Of Tamil Nadu, v. The Chairman

Madras HC15 Dec 2021WP/9068/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, on a common order, dismissed multiple connected writ petitions filed by electricity employee unions concerning post absorption. The court accepted the petitioners' request to withdraw the petitions with liberty to pursue alternate legal remedies.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioners to pursue alternate legal remedies; liberty granted to respondents to raise objections.

Central Organisation Of Tamil Nadu, Vs The Chairman — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 15.12.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.Nos.9068, 10068, 11538, 13740, 32096, 32899 & 34846 of 2019 and all connected pending WMPs

¶6

CENTRAL ORGANISATION OF TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY EMPLOYEES (COTEE) NO.27, MOSQUE STREET, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5

¶7

.. Petitioner in WP.No.9068 of 2019

¶8

TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES FEDERATION, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, 39/101, SINGANNA STREET, CHINDRADRIPET, CHENNAI - 600 002.

¶9

.. Petitioner in WP No.10068 of 2019

¶10

TAMIL NADU MINKAZHAGA THOZHI LALAR MUNNETRA SANGAM, (RECOGNISED REGISTERED TRADE UNION, REGN.NO.38/CPT) REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, S.RATHINASABAPATHI, NO.144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI 02.

¶11

.. Petitioner in WP No.11538 of 2019

¶12

TNEB ACCOUNTS AND EXECUTIVE STAFF UNION, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, K.CHANDRASEKARAN, NO.29, MEERAN SAHIB STREET, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI -600 002

¶13

.. Petitioner in WP No.13740 of 2019

¶14

1 S.RAJU,

¶15

2 V.GNANAPRAKASAM,

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

3 A.VELU, 4 R.JAGADEESWARAN,

¶18

5 N.BALAJI,

¶19

6 R.PRABAKARAN,

¶20

7 K.VEERAMAHENDERAN,

¶21

8 C.SUNDAR,

¶22

9 N.GNANAVEL,

¶23

10 C.PRABAKARAN,

¶24

11 K.ASHOKKUMAR,

¶25

12 S.VINAYAGAM,

¶26

13 S.RAJA,

¶27

14 S.VEMBULI,

¶28

15 K.VINAYAGAM,

¶29

16 D.VANITHA,

¶30

17 K.MOHAN,

¶31

18 B.SARAVANAN,

¶32

19 J.SARAVANAN,

¶33

20 S.REGAL,

¶34

21 R.SUGANANTHAM,

¶35

22 R.MUNUSAMY,

¶36

23 K.KUPPUSWAMY,

¶37

24 R.KUPPAMUTHU,

¶38

25 J.DURAISAMY, .. Petitioners in WP No.32096 of 2019

¶39

TIRUPPUR MAVATTA AMAIPPUSARA, MATTURUM KATTUMANAM THOZHILALAR, MUNNETRA SANGAM, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, A.SARAVANAN, S/O.ADAIKALAM,NO.52, RAJARAO STREET, TIRUPPUR. .. Petitioner in WP No.32899 of 2019

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

1 SIVA ARUMUGAM,

¶42

2 V.VARUNKUMAR,

¶43

3 T.M.ARAVIND,

¶44

4 V.RAVI,

5 S.VELMURUGAN,

6 R.MOHAN,

7 P.ARUJUNAN,

8 P.PUGALENTHI,

9 C.GANDHI,

10 K.MUNIRAJ,

¶51

11 K.ARAVIND,

¶52

12 A.ABDUL ISACK,

¶53

13 B.THANGARAJ,

¶54

14 I.MOHAMAD ABSALIC,

¶55

15 A.VIJAYANANDH,

¶56

16 V.VILVANESH,

¶57

17 M.RAJAGOPAL,

¶58

18 P.KATHIRAVAN,

¶59

19 R.VADIVELU,

¶60

20 P.DAVID,

¶61

21 M.GOPINATH,

¶62

22 M.KANALARASAN,

¶63

23 P.RAJAMOHAN,

¶64

24 P.KARTHIKEYAN,

¶65

25 P.MANI, .. Petitioners in WP No.34846 of 2019

¶66

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶67

¶68

1.THE CHAIRMAN,

¶69

TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-2. 2.THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PERSONNEL), TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD. (TANGEDCO), NO.144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-2.

¶70

3.TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD.(TANGEDCO), REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-2. .. Respondents in WP.No.9068 of 2019

¶71

1 TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 002

¶72

2 THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD., 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 002.

¶73

3 THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PERSONNEL), TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD., 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 002.

¶74

.. Respondents in WP No.10068 of 2019

¶75

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED (TANGEDCO), REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 144, NPKR MALIGAI, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 002.

¶76

.. Respondent in WP No.11538 of 2019

¶77

1 TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION, CORPORATION LTD., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, NO.144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-2.

¶78

2 THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATIION LTD., NO.144,ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-2.

¶79

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶80

3 THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PERSONNEL), TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATIION LTD., NO.144, ANNA SALAI,CHENNAI-2.

¶81

.. Respondents in WP No.13740 of 2019 1 TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED (TANGEDCO), REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, 144, NPKR MALIGAI, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600002 2 THE CHIEF ENGINEER PERSONNEL(TANGEDCO), 144, NPKR MALIGAI, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600002 3 THE CHIEF ENGINEER NCTPS-II, NORTH CHENNAI THERMAL POWER STATION, CHENNAI – 600120 .. Respondents in WP No.32096 of 2019 1 THE CHAIRMAN, TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, NPKRR MAALIGAI, NO.144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI 600 002.

¶82

2 THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PERSONNEL, TAMIL NADU, GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION, CORPORATION LTD., NPKRR MAALIGAI, NO.144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI 600 002. .. Respondents in WP No.32899 of 2019 1 TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED (TANGEDCO), REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 144, NPKR MALIGAI, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI 600002 2 THE CHIEF ENGINEER PERSONNEL (TANGEDCO),, 144, NPKR MALIGAI, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600002 3 THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MTPS, STAGE III, (1 X 600 MW), METTUR THERMAL POWER STATION, METTUR DAM 636401

¶83

.... Respondents in WP No.34846 of 2019

¶84

Prayer in WP.No.9068 of 2019 :

¶85

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in (Per) FB TANGEDCO Proceedings No.8 dated

¶86

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶87

02.3.2019 and proceedings in (Per.) FB TANGEDCO Proceedings No.10 dated 06.3.2019 of the 3rd respondent and Notification No.1/2019 dated 07.3.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioner members as Helper/Field Assistant and pass such other order or direction to meet the ends of justice and award costs.

¶88

Prayer in WP No.10068 of 2019:

¶89

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to Calling for the records pertaining to the orders in (Per) FB TANGEDCO Proceedings No.8, dated 02.03.2019 and (per) FB TANGEDCO proceedings No.10 dated 06.03.2019, issued by the 1st respondent and the Notification No.1/2019 dated 07.03.2019 and the corrigendum issued on 08.03.2019, by the 3^rd respondent, quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from abolishing or reducing any posts, without issuing any notice under section 9(A) of the I.D.Act and also without holding talks and without entering into any new settlement modifying or replacing the settlement dated 22.02.2018 and in detriment to the interest of the workmen and their conditions of service and to absorb the services of the members of the Petitioners Union who are serving as contract labourers in the existing vacancies in the post of field Assistant with all consequential benefits,award costs.

¶90

Prayer in WP No.11538 of 2019:

¶91

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to calling for the records relating to the impugned Notification (Per.) FB TANGEDCO Proceedings No.8 dated 2.3.2019, and consequential Notification (Per) FB TANGEDCO proceedings No.10 dated 6.3.2019 and recruitment notification No.1/2019 dated 07.03.2019, and quash the same.

¶92

Prayer in WP No.13740 of 2019:

¶93

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to Calling for the records pertaining to the orders in (per) FB TANGEDCO proceedings No.10 dated 06.03.2019, issued by the 1st respondent and the Notification No.1/2019 dated 07.03.2019 issued by the 3^rd respondent, by quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from abolishing or reducing any posts, without issuing any notice under section 9(A) of the

¶94

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶95

I.D. Act and also without holding talks and without entering into any new settlement modifying or replacing the settlement dated 22.02.2018 and in detriment to the interest of the workman and their condition of service and to absorb the services of the members of our union who are serving as contract labourer in the existing vacancies in the post of filed Assistant with all consequential benefits, award cost.

¶96

Prayer in 32096 of 2019:

¶97

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to calling for the records of the 1^st respondent pertaining to Notification (Per.) FB TANGEDCO Proceedings No. 8 dated 02.03.2019 and (Per) FB TANGEDCO Proceedings No. 10 dated 06.03.2019 along with Notification No. 1 of 2019 dated 07.03.2019 on the file of the 1st and 2nd Respondents and quash the same in so far as it does not contemplate absorption of the Petitioners already working as helpers to the newly created post of Gangman, and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to absorb the Petitioners in the newly created post of Gangmen.

¶98

Prayer in WP No.32899 of 2019:

¶99

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified to Call for the records of impugned Notification of the 2nd respondent in Letter No.058323 /1535 /G.57/ G.572/2019 dated 16/11/2019 and to quash the same.

¶100

Prayer in WP No.32846 of 2019:

¶101

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to calling for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to Notification (Per.) FB TANGEDCO Proceedings No. 8 dated 02.03.2019 and (Per) FB TANGEDCO Proceedings No. 10 dated 06.03.2019 along with Notification No. 1 of 2019 dated 07.03.2019 on the file of the 1^st and 2^nd Respondents and quash the same in so far as it does not contemplate absorption of the Petitioners already working as helpers to the newly created post of Gangman, and consequently direct the 1^st Respondent to absorb the Petitioners in the newly created post of Gangman.

¶102

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶103

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Stalin for petitioner in WP.No.9068 of 2019 Mr.V.Ajoy Khose for petitioner in WP.No.10068 of 2019 *Ms.C.S.Sreenedhi for * M/s.P.Wilson Associates for petitioner in WP.No.11538 of 2019 Mr.A.R.Suresh for petitioner in WP.No.13740 of 2019

¶104

**Ms.C.S.Sreenedhi for M/s.P.Wilson Associates for petitioners in both WP.Nos. 32096 and 34846 of 2019 Ms.N.R.Jasmine Padma for petitioner in WP.No.32899 of 2019 For Respondents Mr.Anand Gopalan for M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co. in all the writ petitions

¶105

COMMON ORDER

¶106

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

¶107

We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶108

After arguing the writ petitions for some length, the learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioners submit that after the proceedings dated 02.3.2019 issued by the third respondent, followed by the proceedings dated 22.4.2019, a corrigendum was issued vide proceedings dated 09.7.2020 and in view of the same, the petitioners want to avail the alternate remedy for their benefit. They pray for withdrawal of these writ petitions with liberty to avail appropriate alternate legal remedy, as is available to the petitioners for redressal of their grievance.

¶109

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for withdrawal of these writ petitions. However, it is submitted that liberty may be granted to the respondents also to

¶110

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶111

raise legal objections against the remedy taken by the petitioners, if it is not maintainable.

¶112

In view of the said submissions, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. The petitioners are at liberty to avail the alternate legal remedy, as is available to them for redressal of their grievance. At the same time, the respondents are also granted liberty to raise all legal objections against it, if available. Consequently, all connected pending WMPs are also dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

¶113

*** (Corrected order as per letter dated 01/02/2022)**

¶114

Sd/-

¶115

Assistant Registrar(CS VI) 21/12/2021

¶116

//True Copy//

¶117

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶118

To,

¶119

THE CHAIRMAN, TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, 144,ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-2.

¶120

THE CHIEF ENGINEER (PERSONNEL), TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD. (TANGEDCO), NO.144,ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-2.

¶121

THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD.(TANGEDCO), 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-2. 4. THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD., 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 002. 5 THE CHIEF ENGINEER NCTPS-II, NORTH CHENNAI THERMAL POWER STATION, CHENNAI – 600120

¶122

*To be substituted the order already despatched on 07/01/2022

¶123

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶124

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MTPS, STAGE III, (1 X 600 MW), METTUR THERMAL POWER STATION, METTUR DAM 636401.

¶125

+1 cc to M/s.Row and Reddy,Advocate Sr.NO.67544

¶126

+3 ccs to Mr.P.Wilson Associtates,Advocate Sr.NO. 67383 TO 67385

¶127

+1 cc to Mr.A.R.Suresh,Advocate Sr.NO.66916

¶128

+1 cc to Mr.L.Chandrakumar,Advocate Sr.NO. 67329 +6 ccs to M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co,Advocate Sr.NO. 67223,67229

¶129

W.P.No.9068 of 2019 etc. cases

¶130

AJS(CO) A.SK(22.12.2021)

¶131

CT 28/03/2022

¶132

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Central Organisation Of Tamil Nadu, v. The Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Central Organisation Of Tamil Nadu, v. The Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Kaizer Trade Ventures Vs City Union Bank Ltd.

D.Ashok Kumar Vs the Director

G.Saravanan Vs M/S.Thilak International

D.Srinivasan Vs State of Tamilnadu

J.Johnson Davis Vs The Principal District Judge

S.Marimuthu Vs The Secretary