The single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition due to lack of instructions from the petitioner during the hearing, reserving the right to reopen if the petitioner enters appearance.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 28.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.8857 of 2004
V.Selvaraj ... Petitioner
Vs
Labour and Employment Department Rep.by its Secretary
Fort St.George,
Chennai 600 009.
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus directing in the nature of a writ, thereby calling for the records of the 2nd respondent dated 31.08.2001 passed in I.D.No.114/2000 and quash the same and also direct the 3rd respondent to reinstate the petitioner to the post of conductor with all back wages and attendant benefits.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Girija Velmurugan
For Respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal Government Advocate for R1 Mr.D.Raghu for R3
When the matter is taken up for hearing Mrs.Girija, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she has no instruction from her client.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dpq
To
1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George,
Chennai - 9.
2.The Presiding Officer Labour Court, Salem.
3.The General Secretary Salem, Dharmapuri, Erode, Namakkal District Transport and General Labour Union No.21, J1, Vivegananthan Street, Salem – 07.
+1cc to Mr.D.Raghu, Advocate Sr No.36404 +1cc to Government Pleader Sr No.36566
W.P.No.8857 of 2004
GPL (CO) PR (15/09/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.Selvaraj
Government of Tamil Nadu
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
