Writ petition filed under Article 226 regarding SARFAESI Act eligibility was dismissed for default due to lack of pursuit by the petitioner.
Order of dismissal for default placed on the list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.09.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
Bhari Metal Fabrication Pvt. Ltd rep. by its Managing Director Gulam Dastagir 11G, Mount Poonamallee Road Nandambakkam Chennai – 600 089. ...Petitioner Vs.
The Authorised Officer Indian Bank Dr.Alagappa Road Branch 87, Dr.Alagappa Road Purasawakkam Chennai – 600 084. ...Respondent
Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of declaration declaring that the petitioner having fulfilled the statutory conditions as per Section 31(j) of the SARFAESI Act are eligible to the benefit of the above section and the amount due is settled by operation of law.
For the Petitioner : Mr.H.Manojin
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Since the petitioner has not pursued the matter and advocate formerly representing the petitioner says that a change of vakalatnama has been given, W.P.No.8657 of 2017 is dismissed for default.
There will be no order as to costs.
Sd/Deputy Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sasi
To:
The Authorised Officer Indian Bank Dr.Alagappa Road Branch 87, Dr.Alagappa Road Purasawakkam Chennai – 600 084.
W.P.No.8657 of 2017
RLD (CO) A.SK. (08.09.2021)
Bhari Metal Fabrication Pvt. Ltd
The Authorised Officer Indian Bank
Sanjeev Banerjee
P.D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
