Petitioner approached the High Court of Judicature at Madras seeking a writ of mandamus. The court accepted that the relief sought became infructuous and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.07.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
Writ Petition No.8502 of 2014
M.Abdul Khader ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Chairman The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
No.1, Jaffer syrang street
Mannady, Chennai-600 001.
The Chief Executive Officer
No.1, Jaffer Syrang street Mannady, Chennai-600 001.
3.S.Moideen
4.B.Abdul Khader
...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 07.03.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jayendra Krishnan
ORDER
Today, when this matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter.
2.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kj To
W.P.No.8502 of 2014
PCH(CO) LS(31/08/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Abdul Khader
The Chairman The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
S.Moideen
B.Abdul Khader
R.Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
