Remanded

Makkal Vzhiurimal Sankam v. The District Collector

Madras HC28 Apr 2021WP/8182/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition regarding alleged encroachments by a Trust on government land, the Court found the contentions strongly refuted. It declined to examine the merits and instead directed the Tahsildhar to consider the representation with notice to parties. The petition was disposed of on these terms.

What did the court decide?

Tahsildhar directed to consider petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2018 and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks after providing notice to all parties.

Makkal Vzhiurimal Sankam Vs The District… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:28.04.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶7

W.P.No.8182 of 2019 Makkal Vzhiurimai Sankam, Reg. No.92/2018 rep. by its Founder S.Raja, No.29, Kacheri salai, Ponneri, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District. ... Petitioner -vs1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvlalur. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ponneri, Thiruvallur District. 3.The Tahsildhar, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 4.Velammal Educational Trust, rep. by its Chairman, Velammal New-Gen Park, Dr.Vikram Sarabhai Block, Ambattur-Redhills Road, Chennai-600 066. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made by the 4th respondent in Survey Number 176/2 and 176/3 at Pancheti, Thachur-II Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District based on petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2018.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioner

: Mr.G.Gayathri

For Respondents

: Mr.K.S.Suresh

Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3

¶14

: Mr.S.V.R.Subramanian

¶15

for M/s.N.Raja Senthoor Pandian

¶16

for respondent No.4

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(Order of the Court was made by Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.)

¶19

The petitioner complains of the alleged encroachments by the fourth respondent in S.Nos.176/2 and 176/3 at Panchati, ThachurII Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶20

It is stated that Ponneri Taluk has several waterbodies and that the fourth respondent, which is running various educational institutions under different names, has encroached on the lands specified in the aforementioned survey numbers to an extent of 20 acres 40 cents. In spite of submitting representations in this connection, no action has been taken by the official respondents.

¶21

The aforesaid contentions are refuted by learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent.

¶22

Learned Government Advocate represents respondents 1 to 3 and submits that the third respondent would be the appropriate authority to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation.

¶23

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances wherein the contentions of the petitioner are strongly refuted by the contesting fourth respondent, we do not propose to examine the merits of the matter. Instead, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation dated May 18, 2018 of the petitioner and dispose of the same by a reasoned order after providing a reasonable opportunity to all parties affected by such order, including the petitioner and the fourth respondent. Such reasoned order shall be passed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

W.P.No.8182 of 2019 is disposed of on the above terms. There will be no order as to costs.

¶26

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶27

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bbr
To:
1.The District Collector,
Thiruvallur Ditrict,
Thiruvlalur.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Ponneri,
Thiruvallur District.
3.The Tahsildhar,
Ponneri Taluk,
Thiruvallur District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.26026
W.P.No.8182 of 2019
pvs[co]
srg 18/06/2021

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Makkal Vzhiurimal Sankam v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Makkal Vzhiurimal Sankam v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Logeshwar Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Dilip Kumar Vs Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd.

S.KalimuthuMylavan Vs The Chairperson

M.Govindaraj Vs The District Collector

P.Murugesan Vs The District Collector collector

G.Gouthaman Vs The Commissioner