Disposed

The Regional Provident Fund v. M/S.S&S Industries and

Madras HC9 Jul 2021WP/8181/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the Madras High Court suspended proceedings and closed the petition without adjudication, as the matter was pending before the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench, following an EPF claim filed by the organization.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings suspended and writ petition closed; parties directed to work out remedies before NCLT, Chennai Bench.

The Regional Provident Fund Vs M/S.S&S… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 09.07.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶5

W.P.NO.8181 OF 2014

¶6

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, No.37, Royapettah High Road, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

M/s. S & S Industries and Enterprises Limited, No.204 AIEMA Towers, 1^st Main Road, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai 600 058.

¶10

The Presiding Officer, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Scope Minar, Core – II, 4^th Floor, Laxmi Nagar District Centre, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi – 110 092.

¶11

... Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2^nd Respondent, dated 20.09.2011 in Ref.No.ATA No.336(13) of 2011, and quash the order passed therein.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sathyanarayana Prasad For 1^st Respondent : Mr.B.Natarajan

¶14

Petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking to quash the order dated 20.09.2011 passed by the 2^nd Respondent vide Ref.No.ATA No.336(13) of 2011.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material documents available on record.

¶16

As the matter is pending before National Company Law

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench, and that, EPF Organization has filed a Claim dated 22.11.2019, no further adjudication is required in this matter and the Writ Petition is closed. Parties are at liberty to work out their remedy before the NCLT, Chennai. No costs.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

(aeb)

¶24

To:

¶25

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, No.37, Royapettah High Road,

¶26

Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.

¶27

The Presiding Officer, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Scope Minar, Core – II, 4^th Floor, Laxmi Nagar District Centre, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi – 110 092.

W.P.No.8181 of 2014

AJS(CO)

CS/09/08/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Regional Provident Fund v. M/S.S&S Industries and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Regional Provident Fund v. M/S.S&S Industries and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Management of Chemplast Vs the Presiding Officer

S.Venkatesan Vs the Management of the Garrison

M. Joseph Sudersanam Vs the Management of the

M/s.Pulliccar Mills ltd., Vs The Assistant Commissioner

The Management Vs B.R.Chandrasekaran

V.Kumar Vs The General Manager