Disposed

Crown Engineering Enterprises v. The Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC13 Dec 2021WP/6236/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 226 sought a direction for disposing of a GST Credit application. The court, noting the change of counsel and lack of a filed counter, disposed of the petition by directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders within 30 days, expressly reserving opinions on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to dispose of the petitioner's application dated 21.11.2019 and pass appropriate orders within 30 days.

Crown Engineering Enterprises Vs The Assistant… — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.NO.6236 OF 2020

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶7

Crown Engineering Enterprises, Rep by its Managing Director, S.Sendil Kumar,

¶8

No.157, Gandhi Bazaar Street, Bargur, Krishnagiri – 635 104.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

The Assistant Commissioner, Hosur-I Division, Thally Road, Hosur – 635 109.

¶11

The Superintendent, Krishnagiri Range, No.61, West Lind Road, Co-operative Colony, Krishnagiri – 635 001.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to dispose of the application dated 21.11.2019 pending before them in respect of GST – Tran – 1 Credit.

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents.

¶16

Considering the limited nature of relief sought for in this writ petition and also considering the fact that the

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

respondents have not been able to file their counter due to change of Counsel, I am inclined to dispose this writ petition by directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's application dated 21.11.2019 and pass appropriate orders within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that no views are expressed on the merits of the case in this order.

¶19

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

jas

¶25

¶26

The Assistant Commissioner,

¶27

Hosur-I Division, Thally Road, Hosur – 635 109.

¶28

The Superintendent, Krishnagiri Range, No.61, West Lind Road, Co-operative Colony, Krishnagiri – 635 001.

¶29

+1cc to M/s.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate, S.R.No.66548

¶30

+1cc to M/s.N.Murali, Advocate, S.R.No.66749

¶31

W.P.No.6236 of 2020

¶32

VSN-II(CO) RLP(29/12/2021)

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Crown Engineering Enterprises v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Crown Engineering Enterprises v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.K. Electricals Vs The Tax Recovery officer

Shri Mahalingam Karthikeyan Vs The Income Tax Officer

Shri Mahalingam Karthikeyan Vs The Income Tax Officer

Monesh B Hinduja Vs The Commissioner (Appeals)

M/s.Annalakshmi Traders Vs The Assistant commissioner (St)

Hasan Ali Alim Vs The Commissioner