Dismissed

Adani Enterprises Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner of customs (Drawback)

Madras HC11 Jan 2021WP/557/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed an extraordinary writ petition for Certiorari filed regarding a Show Cause Notice dated August 2010. The Court held that there is no cause of action as no proceedings have been initiated over a decade later and the petitioner failed to seek clarification.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and miscellaneous petitions dismissed with no costs.

Adani Enterprises Limited Vs The Assistant… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.01.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶5

Writ Petition No.557 of 2021 and WMP. Nos.612 & 614 of 2021

¶6

Adani Enterprises Limited Represented by its Associate General Manager, F & A Saurabh Shah,

¶7

Adani House, Shrimali Society, Navarangpura, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad 380 009. Now at

¶8

Adani Corporate House, Shantigram, Near Vaishnav Devi Circle, SG Highway, Khodiyar, Ahmedabad 382 421 …Petitioner Vs

¶9

The Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Drawback), Office of Commissioner of Customs (Sea-Export), Custom House, 60, Rajaj Salai,

¶10

Chennai - 600 001 … Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to Show Cause Notice bearing F.No.S.Misc.63/2010-DBK.BRC. dated 10.08.2010 issued by the respondent, quash the same as arbitray and illegal.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Joseph Prabakar

¶13

The petitioner seeks Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to Show Cause Notice bearing F.No.S.Misc.63/2010-DBK.BRC dated 10.08.2010. Inter alia, a stay of the show cause notice has also been sought.

¶14

A reply has been filed to the show cause notice as early as on 23.08.2010 and thereafter, no further proceedings

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

have been initiated by the respondent. The petitioner has also not bothered to appear before the respondents or seek a clarification with regard to what has transpired thereafter. Even without approaching the respondent by way of a representation or a letter seeking clarity in the matter, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a certiorari of the show cause notice, which is more than a decade old.

¶17

Moreover, there appears to be absolutely no trigger for the present Writ Petition and no notice of personal hearing or any other communication has been received after the show cause notice issued in August, 2010. I am of the view that there is

¶18

no cause of action at this juncture to justify this Writ Petition and the same is thus dismissed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Sl
To

¶20

The Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Drawback), Office of Commissioner of Customs (Sea-Export), Custom House, 60, Rajaj Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

¶21

+1cc to Mr.Joseph Prabakar, Advocate Sr.2011

¶22

Writ Petition No.557 of 2021 and WMP. Nos.612 & 614 of 2021

¶23

ssd[co] srg 03/02/2021

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Adani Enterprises Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner of customs (Drawback)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adani Enterprises Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner of customs (Drawback)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.R.K.M.Sand and Aggregates Vs The Principal Commissioner

D.Zeenath Vs The Commissioner

Lancor Holdings Limited Vs The Assistant commissioner

S.Kamlesh Khariwal Vs The Commissioner

Mahalakshmi Mines, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

R.Balasubramaniam Vs The Principal Secretary