Disposed

G.Ravichandran v. The Commissioner

Madras HC4 Mar 2021WP/5299/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a Writ Petition filed under Article 226. It held that since the dispute is a money dispute, it must be redressed before the Civil Court and the police have no role. The petitioner was directed not to harass the petitioner and instructed to approach the Civil Court.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed not to harass him and instructed to approach the competent Civil Court. No costs.

G.Ravichandran Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.No.5299 of 2021

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

Dated : 04.03.2021

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶7

W.P.No.5299 of 2021
G.Ravichandran .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Office of Commissioner of Police,
Railway Station Raod,
Coimbatore – 641 018.
2. The Inspector of Police,
E-2, Peelamedu Police Station,
Coimbatore.
3. The Sub Registrar,
Gandhipuram, Sub Registrar Office,
Coimbatore.
4. Mr.S.Ponnuchamy
5. Mrs.P.Ponmani .. Respondents

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

W.P.No.5299 of 2021

¶10

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent not to harass the petitioner based on complaint dated 15.02.2021 consequently direct the 1^st respondent to initiate necessary action against the respondents 4 and 5. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Manimaran For Respondents : Mr.C.Raghavan Government Advocate O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a

¶12

direction to direct the Respondents not to harass the Petitioner.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶14

Government Advocate for the respondents.

¶15

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶16

W.P.No.5299 of 2021

¶17

¶18

Taking into consideration the fact that the nature of the

¶19

dispute involved in this case is a money dispute, it is for the parties to redress the same before the appropriate Civil Court and the respondent police will have no role to play in a case of this nature.

¶20

This Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the
respondent police not to interfere with the money dispute and it is
open for the parties to agitate their rights before the competent
civil court. No costs.
04.03.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
rka

¶21

http://www.judis.nic.in

W.P.No.5299 of 2021

The Commissioner of Police, Office of Commissioner of Police, Railway Station Raod, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶26

The Inspector of Police, E-2, Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore.

¶27

The Sub Registrar, Gandhipuram, Sub Registrar Office, Coimbatore.

¶28

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

W.P.No.5299 of 2021

rka

W.P.No.5299 of 2021
04.03.2021

¶34

http://www.judis.nic.in

G.Ravichandran v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Ravichandran v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Kannan Vs State by

Abhishek Bothra Vs M.Manisha

S.M.Srilekha Pradeepa Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Varadarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Balu Vs the Inspector of Police

Kumaresan Vs State Rep. by