Dismissed

Traffic Dr. K.R.Ramaswamy v. The Chief Secretary

Madras HC8 Jan 2021WP/454/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a Traffic Doctor seeking writ of mandamus to direct respondents to act on a representation. The court held the matter trivial with no public interest involved and did not entertain the petition, leaving the petitioner to pursue the representation as per law.

What did the court decide?

Petition not entertained; petitioner to pursue representation as per law.

Traffic Dr. K.R.Ramaswamy Vs The Chief Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.01.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶6

W.P.No.454 of 2021

¶7

Traffic Dr. K.R.Ramaswamy ..Petitioner
.Vs.
1. The Chief Secretary
Government of Tamil Nadu
Secretariat Chennai - 600 009.
2. The Secretary
Law Department
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
3. The Secretary
Transport Department
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
4. The District Collector
Cuddalore District,
Tamil Nadu - 607 001.
5. The District Collector
Chennai District,
Chennai - 600 001.
6. The Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai
Chennai - 600 001.
7. The Commissioner
Greater Chennai City Police
Vepary, Chennai - 600 007. .. Respondents

¶8

Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing all the respondents to take necessary action on the petitioner's representation dated 21.12.2020.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioner

¶11

: Mr.A.Ramesh Manikandan

¶12

For Respondents

¶13

: Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan State Government Pleader

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶16

The petition appears to be targeted against a solitary
individual and some additional implement used in the vehicle by
such person.
2. The matter is trivial and hardly of any relevance or
importance. As such, since no great public interest is
involved, the petition is not entertained. It will, however, be
open to the petitioner to pursue the representation in
accordance with law.
W.P.No.454 of 2021 is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Chief Secretary
Government of Tamil Nadu
Secretariat Chennai - 600 009.
2. The Secretary
Law Department
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
3. The Secretary
Transport Department
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
4. The District Collector
Cuddalore District,
Tamil Nadu - 607 001.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The District Collector Chennai District, Chennai - 600 001.

¶19

The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Chennai - 600 001.

¶20

The Commissioner Greater Chennai City Police Vepary, Chennai - 600 007.

¶21

+1cc to M/s.Karthika Ashok, Advocate, S.R.No.1507 +1cc to Mr.A.Ramesh Manikandan, Advocate, S.R.No.2022 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.1378

¶22

W.P.No.454 of 2021
rr ii (27/01/2021)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Traffic Dr. K.R.Ramaswamy v. The Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Traffic Dr. K.R.Ramaswamy v. The Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Tamilnadu Vs G.Santhi

A.Narayanan Vs Ranganathan(Decd)

State of Tamilnadu Vs G.Santhi

The Secretary to Government Vs E.R. Shanmugam

Kalyani Vs the State

The Divisional Forest Officer Vs M.Devendran