Petitioner prayed for writ of certiorari and mandamus under Article 226 to quash Tribunal order. Court held relief became infructuous and dismissed petition without adjudication as nothing survived.
no costs
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.11.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
W.P.No. 40779 of 2002
Tvl.Visura Trading and Investments (I) Limited No.31, Vengaiyar Street Chennai – 600 079 .. Petitioner
Versus
The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai - 104
Chennai
.. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the first respondent dated 28.2.2002 in T.A. No. 691 of 2000 and quash the same as illegal and direct the third respondent to accept the books of accounts produced by the petitioner as correct and complete.
For Petitioner : Mr. S. Balamurugan
For Respondents : Mr. M. Venkateswaran Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Today, when this writ petition is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for has become infructuous and hence nothing survives for adjudication in this
writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.
counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dhk
To
W.P. No. 40779 of 2002
KSM(CO) CT 13/12/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tvl.Visura Trading and Investments (I) Limited
The Secretary, The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai
The Appellate Assistant Commissioner CT II Chennai
The State of Tamil Nadu
R. MAHADEVAN
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
