Ravi v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court set aside disqualification of petitioner as director under Companies Act, 2013 due to lack of prior notice. Court applied ratio from earlier Division Bench judgment allowing reappointment and permitting access to minor update in order without issuing new hearing.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order dated 17.12.2018 disqualifying petitioner as director is set aside; petitioner permitted to be reappointed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.02.2021
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.4016 of 2021
&
W.M.P.Nos.4587 & 4590 of 2021
Ravi ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Union of India,
Represented by its Secretary,
Ministry of Corporate Affairs,
Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road,
New Delhi – 110 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order disqualifying the petitioner as a director without prior notice is maintainable in light of established court precedents?
Whether the impugned disqualification order violates provisions of the Companies Act, 2013?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ravi
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Registrar of Companies
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court