Disposed

M.Selvan v. The District Collector

Madras HC4 Feb 2021WP/3901/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition regarding encroachment on a road identified as a burial ground. The bench refused to exercise discretionary PIL jurisdiction due to limited public interest but directed officials to consider the pending representation.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider representation dated 19.9.2019 and pass speaking order within six weeks after giving fifth respondent opportunity.

M.Selvan Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.02.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶7

W.P.No.3901 of 2020
M.Selvan ..Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Erode District,
Erode.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Gobichettipalayam Taluk,
Erode.
3. The Revenue Tahsildar,
Gobichettipalayam Taluk,
Erode District.
4. The Village Administrative Officer,
Siruvalur Village,
Gobichettipalayam Taluk,
Erode District.
5. Mohankumar ..Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the
respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment made on the road
S.No.386/3 at Siruvalur Village, Gobichettypalayam Taluk, Erode
District by considering the petitioner representation dated
19.9.2019.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Shase For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Suresh Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr.Eswarkumar for respondent No.5

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

ORDER

¶11

(Order of the Court was made by

¶12

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.)

¶13

This writ petition pertains to the alleged encroachment made on the road in S.No.386/3 in Siruvalur Village, Gobichettypalayam Taluk, Erode District.

¶14

The petitioner is a resident of the village concerned and complains that there is an encroachment on a specific survey number which is a burial ground. It is further stated that a representation has been given by the petitioner in this connection on 19.9.2019, but no action was taken thereon.

¶15

In several cases of this description, this Court observed that it is not possible to exercise discretionary jurisdiction in public interest litigation unless the matter involves a significant impact on the larger public interest.

¶16

Accordingly, without examining the merits of the representation issued by the petitioner, the official respondents concerned are directed to consider the representation dated 19.9.2019 and dispose of the same by a speaking order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the fifth respondent herein and any other affected parties. Such order shall be passed within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the event the petitioner is aggrieved thereby, it is open to the petitioner to pursue legal remedies otherwise than by a public interest litigation, after establishing his locus standi.

¶17

W.P.No.3901 of 2020 is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

sasi

¶23

To:

¶24

The District Collector, Erode District, Erode.

¶25

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam Taluk,

¶26

Erode.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

The Revenue Tahsildar, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District.

¶29

The Village Administrative Officer, Siruvalur Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District.

¶30

+1cc to Mr.M.Guruprasad, Advocate, S.R.No.6447

¶31

W.P.No.3901 of 2020

¶32

RSV(CO)
KKV/23/02/2021

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Selvan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Selvan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.S.Gopalan Vs The Chairman

M.Balasubramaniam (Deceased) Vs State of Tamilnadu

The Chairman Vs Raghu M.G.

The Government of Tamilnadu Vs K.Selvam

The Secretary to Government Vs N.Rajendran

B.Veman Vs The District Collector