Dismissed

Harur Valli Madurai Varattaru v. The District Collector

Madras HC16 Dec 2021WP/34836/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 226 by a Sangam against government officials requesting public auction of fishing rights, the Petitioner's counsel submitted that nothing further survived for consideration. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.

What did the court decide?

No costs awarded; petition dismissed as infructuous.

Harur Valli Madurai Varattaru Vs The District… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Writ Petition No.34836 of 2019

¶6

Harur Valli Madurai Varattaru Meenavargal Nala Sangam, rep. by its President Ramesh, (vide Reg.No.SRG/Dharmapuri/189/2019) ... Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.

¶9

The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Dharmapuri.

¶10

The Assistant Executive Engineer, (Melpennaiyar Vadineela Upakottam) Atanur (PWD).

¶11

The Executive Engineer (PWD), Dharmapuri. ... Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents herein from allotting the fishing rights at Valli Madurai Dam except through public auction, so as to enable the Petitioner's Sangam to participate, so that, the Respondents may get more revenue to the Government.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Balasubramanian

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, nothing further survives for consideration in this Writ Petition.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

(aeb)

¶23

To: 1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 2. The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Dharmapuri. 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer, (Melpennaiyar Vadineela Upakottam) Atanur (PWD). 4. The Executive Engineer (PWD), Dharmapuri. +1cc to M/s.M.Balasubramanian, Advocate, S.R.No.67035 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.67894

¶24

W.P.No.34836 of 2019

¶25

KJ(CO) SU(03/01/2022)

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Harur Valli Madurai Varattaru v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harur Valli Madurai Varattaru v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Mohan Vs The Managing Director

M/s.Arenco Catering Vs The Director / Cs

Manju Chamundeeswari Vs Union of India

N.Balasubramanian Vs The Managing Direcctor

M/s Phoenix Technology Corporation Vs The Chief Singal

Private Iti (Industrial Training Institute), Vs The Deputy Director General of Training