Dismissed

Sampath v. The Regional Officer

Madras HC17 Dec 2021WP/34520/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph judgment dismissed a writ petition filed by an employee seeking a mandamus to direct the Central Bank of India to sanction an educational loan for his daughter's first year of nursing studies.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing respondents to sanction educational loan is dismissed with liberty to file fresh representation.

Sampath Vs The Regional Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.12.2021

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

W.P.No.34520 of 2018

Sampath

...Petitioner

1.The Regional Officer, The Senior Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, No.48/49, Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai -08.

¶10

2.The Zonal Officer, The Field General Manager Central Bank of India, 3^rd Floor, No.48/49, Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai -08.

¶11

3.The Manager, Central Bank of India, No.9, Kutcherry Road, Kallakurichi Taluk, Villupuram District. ...Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.12.2018 and further direct the third respondent to give educational loan to petitioner's daughter named Sarumathi, pursuing B.Sc (Nursing) first year.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Silambu Selvan For R1 & R2 : No Appearance ORDER

¶14

This Writ Petition has been filed, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2018 and further direct the third respondent to give educational loan to petitioner's daughter named Sarumathi, pursuing B.Sc (Nursing) first year.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

2.This Writ Petition has been filed in the year 2018, seeking direction to the third respondent for the sanction of educational loan to petitioner's daughter. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued to sanction the loan to the petitioner's daughter for her first year course, by the respondent. By this time, the petitioner's daughter is pursuing final year. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner argued for the sanction of loan for the first year course, this Court is inclined to dismiss the Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation to the respondents if the petitioner's daughter requires loan for final year or for previous years.

¶17

3.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No

¶18

costs.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

rst

¶24

To:

¶25

1.The Regional Officer,

¶26

The Senior Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, No.48/49, Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai -08.

¶27

2.The Zonal Officer,

¶28

The Field General Manager Central Bank of India, 3^rd Floor, No.48/49, Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai -08.

¶29

3.The Manager, Central Bank of India, No.9, Kutcherry Road, Kallakurichi Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶30

W.P.No.34520 of 2018

¶31

SSI(CO) RVM(11/01/2022)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sampath v. The Regional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sampath v. The Regional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Coimbatore Corporation Vs The Commissioner

Mrs.B.Jayanthi, Vs The Manager (Claims)

M/s.Jkm Ferrotech Ltd., Vs The Chairman

R.Ramya Vs The Registrar

Renuka Vs The Chairman

P.Samiappa Gounder, Vs Tamil Nadu State Information