Dismissed
C.Mohan v. The Commissioner
Madras HCWP/34118/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a writ petition filed under Article 226 regarding the quashing of a demand notice, the petitioner sought withdrawal. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED : 06.07.2021
¶3
CORAM
¶4
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
¶5
W.P.No.34118 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.39639, 39640 & 39643 of 2018
¶6
R.C.Mohan
¶7
... Petitioner
¶8
-vs-
¶9
- 1.The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai – 600 003.
¶10
- 2.Deputy Regional Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Door No.36B, 2nd Cross Street, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai – 600 030.
¶11
- 3.Assistant Revenue Officer, Zone-9, Greater Chennai Corporation, 1, Lake Area, 4th Cross Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
¶12
- 4.Assessor, Zone-9, Ward-121, Greater Chennai Corporation, 1, Lake Area, 4th Cross Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
R.C. Mohan
- respondent
The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation
Coram
AI extract
S.M. Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court