Disposed

Tmt.K.Banumathi v. District Collector

Madras HC25 Oct 2021WP/33798/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed on behalf of a deceased petitioner for a survey of land to obtain a patta, the Supreme Court of India directed the legal heirs to submit a fresh representation with fees for the third respondent to re-survey the land within two weeks. The petition is now disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Legal heirs of the deceased petitioner allowed two weeks to submit a fresh representation with fees for the third respondent to resurvey the land and issue patta.

Tmt.K.Banumathi Vs District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 25.10.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.No.33798 of 2014 and M.P.No. 1 of 2014

K.Banumathi

... Petitioner

-Vs-

The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Salem, Salem District.

¶11

The Tahsildar, Attur, Salem District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Yethappur Police Station, Yethappur, Attur Taluk, Salem District.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to resurvey the land in Survey No.126/1, Resurvey No.300/1A in an extent of 896 sq ft. in Salem Attur Main Road, Yethappur, Attur Taluk, Salem District, in the presence of the petitioner's advocate and give patta to the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to complete the construction.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Vediappan for C.S.Associates. For Respondents : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan Government Advocate.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to resurvey the land in Survey No.126/1, Resurvey No.300/1A in an extent of 896 sq ft. in Salem Attur Main Road, Yethappur, Attur Taluk, Salem District, in the presence of the petitioner's advocate and give patta to the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to complete the construction.

¶18

Heard Mr.C.Vediappan, learned counsel appearing for the

¶19

petitioner and Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the sole petitioner died. On perusal of the writ petition reveals that the deceased petitioner sought for direction, directing the third respondent to resurvey the land in Survey No.126/1, Resurvey No.300/1A in an extent of 896 sq ft. in Salem Attur Main Road, Yethappur, Attur Taluk, Salem District.

¶21

Considering the said prayer, the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh representation with fees to the third respondent to re-survey the subject land, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

On receipt of the same, the third respondent is directed to comply the request made by the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner after issuance of notice to the parties concerned if any.

¶23

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

¶30

The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

The Superintendent of Police, Salem, Salem District.

¶33

The Tahsildar, Attur, Salem District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Yethappur Police Station, Yethappur, Attur Taluk, Salem District.

¶34

+1cc to M/s.C.Vediappan, Advocate, S.R.No.54723

¶35

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.55082

¶36

W.P.No.33798 of 2014 and M.P.No. 1 of 2014

¶37

VSN-II(CO) SU(17/11/2021)

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tmt.K.Banumathi v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tmt.K.Banumathi v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijendiraiah Vs The District Revenue Officer

V.N.Manohar, Vs The Secretary to Government

G.Chandrasekaran Vs the District Revenue Officer

J.Rajendran Vs The Distirct Collector

B.Shyamala Vs Tahasildar

Chandrakasan Vs the State Rep by