V.Elangovan, v. State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the prayer sought for by the petitioner had become unreal or incapable of being granted at the time of hearing.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition and connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.11.2021
C O R A M
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.NO.33355 OF 2017 AND W.M.P.NOS.36865 & 36866 OF 2017
V.Elangovan ... Petitioner
.Vs.
- The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development, Secretariat, Fort St.George,
- Chennai -9.
- The Tamil Nadu Houding Board, Rep. by its Managing Director, Nandanam Division, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.
- The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Foreshore Estate Division, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Nanthnam, Chennai - 600 035. ... Respondents
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, seeking to call for the records in G.O.Ms.No.118 dated 04.07.2017, on the file of the first respondent and consequential proceedings in Letter No.Pa.Pa.Ko/00029/2017 dated 27.07.2017 on the file of the third respondent and quash the same and direct the third respondent to accept surrender of the petitioner's flat in R.O.4, Foreshore Estate, Chennai - 600 028 and not insist to pay the enhanced amount from July-2017 onwards
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Elangovan
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Tamil Nadu Housing Board
- respondent
Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court