Held that the writ petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to approach the Competent Authority under the Income Tax Informant Reward Scheme for redressal of grievances regarding money lending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :01.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.33090 of 2018
V.Durganathan ...Petitioner
Vs
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent herein to conduct enquiry based on the petitioners complaint dated 05.11.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ramesh For Respondents : Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) for R1 Mr.V.Veluchamy Government Advocate for R2 & R3 Not ready in notice for R4
O R D E R
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the first respondent to conduct the enquiry based on the petitioner's complaint dated 05.11.2018.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pns
To
+1cc to Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan , Advocate, S.R.No.30510 +1cc to the Government Pleader, High Court, Madras, S.R.No.30858 W.P.No.33090 of 2018
AK-II(CO) RLP(04/08/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Income Tax Department is directed to conduct an enquiry based on the petitioner's complaint regarding money lending grievances?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Durganathan
The Commissioner, Income Tax Department
The District Collector
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
