The petition challenging permission for a power line on agricultural land was closed as the petitioner had already received compensation and no further adjudication was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.12.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.32824 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.33251 and 33253 of 2019
Tmt. K.Kalaiselvi ... Petitioner
Vs.
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari or order or direction in the nature of a writ calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.2586/2019/E1 dated 29.10.2019 quash the same.
For Petitioner : M/S.V.Elangovan For Respondents R1 and R3 : Mr.P.Gurunathan
Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent R2 : M/S.Jayesh Dolia
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the agricultural land situated in S.No.283/1 to the extent of 4.5 acres at Kolumanguli village, Dharapuram Taluk. The Central Government had granted permission to the 2nd respondent for the project of establishment of 400 KV DC Line with Quad HVDC connecting Pugalur High Tension Power Station and Arasur Electrical Terminus. The petitioner objected the same and
submitted her objection for the erection of towers in her land. Since the said land of the petitioner was permitted to erect the tower line, the 1st respondent passed an order in Na.Ka.No.2586/2019/E1 dated 29.10.2019 granting permission to the 2nd respondent for erection of 400 KV DC line, following which, the tower lines were erected and compensation amount has also been paid to the petitioner. However, without ascertaining the above said facts, the petitioner has filed this Writ petition. Hence, the learned counsel for the respondents prays for dismissal of this Writ petition.
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
anu
To
+1 cc to Mr.S.Doraisamy, Advocate Sr.NO.66682
W.P.No.32824 of 2019
and W.M.P.Nos.33251 and 33253 of 2019
mt(CO) A.SK(01.02.2022)
Tmt. K.Kalaiselvi
The Collector, Tiruppur District
Deputy General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited
The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
