Dismissed

T.Manohar Kumar Surana v. the Sub Registrar

Madras HC7 Oct 2021WP/32440/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the increase of guideline value for lands in Kallakurichi, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter was settled. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.

T.Manohar Kumar Surana Vs the Sub Registrar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.10.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.NO.32440 OF 2013

¶6

T.Manohar Kumar Surana ... Petitioner

¶7

-Vs-

¶8

The Sub-Registrar Office of the Sub-Registrar, Kallakurichi Joint-II, Sub Registrar Office, Kallakurichi-606 202, Villupuram District.

¶9

The District – Registrar (Admin) Office of the District-Registrar, No.57/4, Gopuram Complex, Kacheri Road, Kallakurichi- 606 202, Villupuram District.

¶10

The Deputy Inspector of General, D.I.G.Officer, No.50, Sankara Naidu Street, Thirupapuliyur, Cuddalore – 607 002.

¶11

The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mylapore. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer :-

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of increasing the guideline value for the lands situated in survey No.119/1F2, 119/1D and 119/1B situated within the Kallakurichi Joint-II, Sub-Registrar Office, Kallakurichi Village, Villupuram District, Zone Cuddalore from 01.04.2012 and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary, against the law, against the principles of natural justice and thereby direct the respondents to reduce the

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

guideline value from Rs.2,500/- (Rupees Two Thousand Five Hundred Only) to Rs.480/- (Rupees Four Hundred Eighty only) per Sq.ft. And to reclassifying the lands from Commercial Class I Type-II to Residential Special Type-I.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sunil Kumar

¶17

For Respondents: Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan Government Advocate.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Today, when the matter is taken for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the matter has been settled and the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶20

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

rts

¶26

¶27

The Sub-Registrar Office of the Sub-Registrar, Kallakurichi Joint-II,

¶28

Sub Registrar Office, Kallakurichi-606 202, Villupuram District.

¶29

The District – Registrar (Admin) Office of the District-Registrar, No.57/4, Gopuram Complex, Kacheri Road, Kallakurichi- 606 202, Villupuram District.

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

The Deputy Inspector of General, D.I.G.Officer, No.50, Sankara Naidu Street, Thirupapuliyur, Cuddalore – 607 002. 4. The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mylapore. +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.53132, 52752 W.P.No.32440 of 2013

¶32

KSM(CO) CS/08/11/2021

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Manohar Kumar Surana v. the Sub Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Manohar Kumar Surana v. the Sub Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Vedavinayagam Vs the State of Tamilnadu

S. Manova Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

T.Rajappa Vs the District Collector

Thiruchengode Agricultural Vs the District Collector

V.Sivakumar Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Kolanjiammal @ Sarasu, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu