The High Court of Madras dismissed the writ petition filed by K. Narasimha Naidu seeking restoration of patta No.1128 in his name. The court held the prayer infructuous as the third respondent had already effected the necessary changes to the patta entries.
None; the writ petition was dismissed as the relief sought was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
WP.No.32181 of 2019
[Video Conferencing]
K.Narasimha Naidu
.. Petitioner
Versus
4.J.Shanthi .. Respondents
Prayer : - Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 25.07.2016 and 29.11.2016 pursuant to the recommendation report of the 3rd respondent dated 30.01.2017 and to restore the patta No.1128 in the name of the petitioner and his family members.
ORDER
Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 in the writ petition and notice to the 4th respondent has been dispensed with.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.38075
WP.No.32181 of 2019
SSD(CO)
HS(25/08/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Narasimha Naidu
The Collector, Office of the Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram
The Sub-Collector, Office of the Sub-Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram
The Tahsildar, Sriperambadur Taluk, Sriperambadur, Kancheepuram District
J. Shanthi
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
