A writ petition filed for the release of an impounded vehicle. As the petitioner was absent for the hearing, the High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.10.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.NO.31366 OF 2017 AND WMP.NO.34467 OF 2017
P.Sundaram
Vs
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the vehicle viz., Ashok Leyland Taurus Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-48-B-3322.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu, Government Counsel
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 21.09.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this matter was directed to be posted today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either in person or through the learned counsel. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
Sub Assistant Registrar
av
To
CA(CO) CS/27/10/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Sundaram
The District Collector, Krishnagiri
The Tahsildar, Krishnagiri
The Special Deputy Tahsildar (Mines), Krishnagiri
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
