Dismissed

S.Akilan, S/o.Dr.K.K.Sekar, v. The District Collector

Madras HC23 Nov 2021WP/3112/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the failure to declare surplus lands. Having determined that a connected petition was disposed of via a compromise agreement requiring land distribution, this court closed the present petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; petition closed consequent to discharge of a connected petition via compromise.

S.Akilan, S/o.Dr.K.K.Sekar, Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 23.11.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.NO.3112 OF 2017

¶6

AND W.M.P.NO.3038 OF 2017

S.Akilan

... Petitioner

-Vs-

The District Collector, Collector Office, Thiruvarur District.

¶11

The Revenue Divisional Officer, (Additional in charge Joint Commissioner Land Reforms Act), Revenue Divisional Office, Tiruvarur.

¶12

The Thasildhar, Valangaiaman, Tiruvarur District.

¶13

Venu Gopal

¶14

V.Ramu

¶15

Anandan ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer :-

¶17

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to identify and declare the surplus lands as submitted by the land owners under Tamil Nadu land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on land) Act 1961 and forbearing the respondents 4 to 6 herein from interfering with the petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated at Survey No.68/4, New No: 68/4B to an extent of 0.89 cents at No:53, Narthangudi Village, Valangaiman Taluk, Thiruvarur District.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

For Petitioner : M/s.J.Jyothi

¶20

For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader.

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to identify and declare the surplus lands as submitted by the land owners under Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on land) Act 1961 and forbearing the respondents 4 to 6 herein from interfering with the petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated at Survey No.68/4, New No: 68/4B to an extent of 0.89 cents at No:53, Narthangudi Village, Valangaiman Taluk, Thiruvarur District.

¶23

This Court in the connected Writ Petition in W.P.No.29954 of 2011 has passed the following order on 30.09.2021:-

¶24

“This writ petition is filed to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records from the second respondent relating to the order bearing No.M.R.I./15-K/37/72/PPN/A2, dated 28.07.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioners for the land assigned to them under the order bearing No.M.R.4.57/37/72/Valangai/AA4, dated 30.04.1990 and award costs.

¶25

While pending the Writ Petition, there is settlement between the petitioners and the respondents 6 and 8 to 12 by the compromise agreement dated 24.09.2021. In view of the above settlement, the joint memo filed before this Court by the petitioners and the respondents 6 and 8 to 12 dated 28.09.2021.

¶26

Recording the said joint memo dated 28.09.2021, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise agreement dated 24.09.2021 entered between the petitioners and the respondents 6 and 8 to 12. The compromise agreement dated 24.09.2021 shall form part of this order. The respondents 3 and 4 are directed to distribute the land ad-measuring 4.996 standard acres situated at Narthangudi, Valangaiman Taluk, Thiruvarur District in equal shares to the petitioners within a period of twelve weeks from the

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.”

¶29

In view of the above order, the present Writ Petition is

¶30

closed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶33

//True Copy//

¶34

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶35

¶36

¶37

The District Collector,

¶38

Collector Office,

¶39

Thiruvarur District.

¶40

The Revenue Divisional Officer, (Additional in charge Joint Commissioner

¶41

Land Reforms Act),

¶42

Revenue Divisional Office,

¶43

Tiruvarur.

¶44

The Thasildhar,

¶45

Valangaiaman,

¶46

Tiruvarur District.

¶47

+1cc to Mr.N.Nandagopal, Advocate, S.R.No.60500 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.61107

¶48

W.P.No.3112 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.3038 of 2017

¶49

PL(CO)

¶50

PM/09/12/2021

¶51

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Akilan, S/o.Dr.K.K.Sekar, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Akilan, S/o.Dr.K.K.Sekar, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Muthukaruppan Vs The District Registrar

J.Selvi Vs The Inspector General of Registration

N.Selvan Vs The Sub Registrar

A.Vijayamurugan Vs The District Collector

S.Velavan Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Mrs.Sugunammal, Vs the Principal Secretary to