Dismissed
C.T.Varkey v. the Director of School Edu.
Madras HCWP/30832/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought parity in pay. Court dismissed writ petition as infructuous without elaboration.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.01.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.No.30832 of 2005
C.T.Varkey ...Petitioner
-Vs1. The Director of School Education Chennai 600 006. 2. The Chief Educational Officer Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris District. ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in O.Mu.No.120521/L2/2002 dated 30.01.2003 and quash the same and direct the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioner on par with his junior Mr.Chacko, BT Assistant, Govt.High School, Ambalavayal and grant him all consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondents : Mr.S.Suresh Kumar, Government Advocate O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, the writ petition has become infructuous.
kst
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.2128
W.P.No.30832 of 2005
ssi(CO) rv(05/02/2021)
C.T. Varkey
The Director of School Education Chennai
The Chief Educational Officer Udhagamandalam
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court