Dismissed

N.Visvam, v. The Deputy Director & The

Madras HC17 Nov 2021WP/29108/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking writ of mandamus regarding interference with his clinic's peaceful functioning. The petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive hearing dates. The Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

N.Visvam, Vs The Deputy Director & The — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.11.2021

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶5

W.P.NO.29108 OF 2017

¶6

AND W.M.P.NO.31368 OF 2017

¶7

N.Visvam ...Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Deputy Director & The Joint Director, Health and Family Welfare, Office of Joint Director at Villuppuram, Villupuram District.

¶10

The Superintend of Police, Villupuram District. Villupuram.

¶11

The District Collector, Villupuram District. Villupuram. 4. The Inspector of Police, Vikravandi Police Station, Vikravandi, Villupuram District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer:

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, seeking to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner, the peaceful functioning of the petitioner's clinic.

¶14

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

ORDER

¶17

When the matter was taken for hearing on 10.11.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter got adjourned to 17.11.2021. Accordingly, the matter is listed today. Today also none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, which shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to keep the matter pending any more. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶19

//True Copy//

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

rst

¶22

To:

¶23

The Deputy Director & The Joint Director, Health and Family Welfare, Office of Joint Director at Villuppuram, Villupuram District.

¶24

The Superintend of Police, Villupuram District. Villupuram.

¶25

The District Collector, Villupuram District. Villupuram.

¶26

The Inspector of Police, Vikravandi Police Station, Vikravandi, Villupuram District.

¶27

W.P.No.29108 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.31368 of 2017

¶28

PL(CO) PM/01/12/2021

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Visvam, v. The Deputy Director & The

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Visvam, v. The Deputy Director & The

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayakumari Vs The District Revenue Officer

S.P.S.Nathan @ Vs The District Collector and

A. Joseph Stanely Vs Secretary to Government of

J. Kabir Mariam Vs The Chief Manager

S.Vanitha Vs The District Collector

Jain Cambrae East Flat Owners Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and