The High Court disposed of three writ petitions as infructuous without further adjudication, as the Economic Offence Cases registered against the petitioner had been closed, rendering the cause for writ non-existent.
The writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.04.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.2909 to 2911 of 2001 and W.M.P.Nos.3989 to 3991 of 2001
M/s.Sassi Enterprises, Rep., by its Partner, Mrs.N.Sassikala, No.81/36, Poes Garden, Chennai-600 086. .. Petitioner in 2909 & 2910 of 2001 N.Sassikala ... Petitioner in WP. 2911 of 2009 -vs1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – II (2), No.108, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Tax Deduction at Source – IV (TDS-IV), No.108, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. .. Respondents in all W.Ps.
Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos.202, 203 & 194 of 1997 respectively, on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Economic Offences Court No.1, Egmore, Chennai so as to quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram (In all W.Ps.) For Respondents: Mr.A.P.Srinivas, (In all W.Ps.) Senior Standing Counsel ORDER
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner, in all these writ petitions, made a submission that the Economic Offence Cases registered against the writ petitioner have been closed.
2.Thus, in view of the above, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken, as the cause did not exist and accordingly, the writ petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
abr
To
1.The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,
Egmore, Ecnomic Offences Court No.I,
Egmore, Chennai.
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle – II (2),
No.108, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
3.The Income Tax Officer,
Tax Deduction at Source – IV (TDS-IV),
No.108, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate, S.R.No. 24111
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 24278, 24279, 24281
W.P.Nos.2909 to 2911 of 2001
PP(CO) GN(07/07/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions filed under Article 226 requiring quashing of Economic Offence Cases stand disposed of as being infructuous due to the closure of the implicated cases.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s.Sassi Enterprises, Rep., by its Partner, Mrs.N.Sassikala
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – II (2)
The Income Tax Officer, Tax Deduction at Source – IV (TDS-IV)
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
