K. Perumal v. The Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging eviction proceedings as infructuous based on counsel's submission that the relief sought was no longer viable.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.NO.28519 OF 2017 AND W.M.P.NO.30660 OF 2017
1.K.Perumal
2.Kumari ...Petitioners
..Vs..
- 1.The Collector, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai.
- 2.The Special Tahsildar (ADW), Polur Taluk, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District.
- 3.The Tahsildar, Kalasapakkam Taluk, Kalasapakkam, Tiruvannamalai District. ...Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from evicting the petitioners from the agricultural land situated in S.No.531/5 and 531/6 of Kumbalamarathur Village at Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District to the extent of 3 acres without following the procedure as laid down under law and pass such further or other orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Perumal
- petitioner
Kumari
- respondent
The Collector, Tiruvannamalai District
- respondent
The Special Tahsildar (ADW), Polur Taluk
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Kalasapakkam Taluk
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court