Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking release of a lorry. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the relief sought had become infructuous. The court dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as the relief sought has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.28468 of 2017
V.Arumugapandian
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent herein to release the Lorry bearing Registered No.TN 48Z 4650.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajapandian
For Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu Government Advocate
ORDER
The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition to direct the 2nd respondent herein to release the Lorry bearing Registration No.TN 48Z 4650.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
msr
To
W.P.No.28468 of 2017
SR(CO) SU(23/08/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Arumugapandian
The District Collector, Thiruvallur
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ponneri
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
