The High Court of Madras disposed of a writ petition filed by a proprietorship concern challenging commercial tax proceedings, noting the petitioner must exercise statutory remedy granted by the Supreme Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.01.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P. No. 28299 of 2010 and M.P. No. 1 of 2010
M/s.Life Care Systems,
Represented by its Proprietrix, No.5, Mandapam Road, II Street, Kilpauk Garden, Chennai – 600 010. ... Petitioner Vs.
The Commercial Tax Officer, Kilpauk Assessment Circle, Chennai. ... Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in TIN.33761122303/2009-10 and quash the proceedings dated 03.12.2010 issued therein.
For Petitioner : Ms.Hema Muralikrishnan
For Respondent : Mr.R.Swarnavel
Government Advocate
ORDER
The petitioner has filed the writ petition, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in TIN.33761122303/2009-10 and quash the proceedings dated 03.12.2010.
M/s.Life Care Systems
The Commercial Tax Officer, Kilpauk Assessment Circle, Chennai
C.SARAVANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
