Dismissed

G.Ayyanar v. The Director of Higher Secondary

Madras HC15 Dec 2021WP/28249/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the High Court of Madras directed the 2nd Respondent, District Educational Officer, to consider a representation by the petitioner regarding alleged illegal donations and difficulties faced by his son at a school. The Court ordered a hearing and specified a four-week timeline for a decision without deciding on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd Respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation, afford a hearing, and pass orders within four weeks.

G.Ayyanar Vs The Director of Higher Secondary — Consumer Protection | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Writ Petition No.28249 of 2019

¶6

G.Ayyanar ... Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

The Director of Higher Secondary School Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai 600 034.

¶9

The District Educational Officer (Rural), Collectorate, Salem – 636 001.

¶10

The Head Master, Panamarathupatti Government Higher Secondary School, Panamarathupatti, Salem District. ... Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd Respondent to consider and pass orders on merits by disposing of the written representation made by the Petitioner on 09.05.2019 within a stipulated time.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For 1^st Respondent : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu, Addl. Government Pleader For 2^nd Respondent : Mr.M.S.Arasakumar, Government Advocate (Education) ORDER

¶13

Petitioner has come up with the above Writ Petition seeking a direction to the 2^nd Respondent to consider and pass orders on merits by disposing of the written representation made by him on 09.05.2019, within a stipulated time.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

According to the Petitioner, he intended to admit his

¶16

son in XI Standard in the 3^rd Respondent Government School. But, the School demanded a sum of Rs.5,000/- as donation. Hence, the Petitioner made a representation to the 2^nd Respondent on 09.05.2019 to take necessary action against the School administration. Thereafter, the Petitioner's son was admitted in the 3^rd Respondent School. However, the Petitioner's son is facing many difficulties at the hands of the 3^rd Respondent. Hence, having no other alternative, the Petitioner is before this Court with the above Writ Petition.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused

¶18

the material documents available on record.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into its merits, this Court directs the 2^nd Respondent herein to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 09.05.2019 in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

(aeb)

¶25

To:

¶26

The Director of Higher Secondary School Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai 600 034.

¶27

The District Educational Officer (Rural), Collectorate, Salem – 636 001.

¶28

The Head Master, Panamarathupatti Government Higher Secondary School, Panamarathupatti, Salem District.

¶29

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.67920, 67041

W.P.No.28249 of 2019

RSV(CO)

SB(30/12/2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Ayyanar v. The Director of Higher Secondary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Ayyanar v. The Director of Higher Secondary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sivakumar Vs the State Rep by

Sri Thulasidhasar Memorial Society, Vs The Registrar of Societies

Madras Social Service Society, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Ashraf Ali, Vs The Managing Director

S.Mary Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

K.S.Srinivasan Vs The District Collector