The High Court of Madras disposed of writ petitions challenging an income tax auction order as infructuous because the cause arose for filing no longer existed.
The writ petition stood disposed of as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :09.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.27903 of 2018
and
W.M.P.Nos.32455 & 32457 of 2018
M/s.Cotton Tex, No.16, Ram Nagar Main Road, Tirupur – 641 602. ...Petitioner
Vs
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in PAN.AACFC0125A and quash the proceedings in Form No.ITCP 13 for auction of property dated 26.09.2018.
For Petitioner : Ms.G.Vardini Karthik For M/s.K.M.Vijayan and Associates
For Respondents : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap Junior Standing counsel
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner, through Video-Conferencing, made a submission that the cause arose for the purpose of filing of the writ petition did not exists as of now. Thus, no further adjudication needs to
be entertained.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Kak
To:
+2ccs to M/s.Arun Kurian Joseph, Advocate, S.R.No.39505
W.P.No.27903 of 2018
SR-II(CO) SU(27/08/2021)
M/s. Cotton Tex
Tax Recovery Officer
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
