Allowed

Mrs.Dr.Lakshmi Ravindran v. The Commissioner Corporation Madras

Madras HC10 Dec 2021WP/26243/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court issued a writ of Mandamus directing the Commissioner of Corporation Madras and the Assistant Revenue Officer to correct the name on the property tax receipt from 'Dr. Lakshmi Purushothaman' to 'Dr. Lakshmi Ravindran' within thirty days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to correct the petitioner's name in the property tax assessment from Dr. Lakshmi Purushothaman to Dr. Lakshmi Ravindran within thirty days.

Mrs.Dr.Lakshmi Ravindran Vs The Commissioner… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 10.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.No.26243 of 2021

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶7

Mrs.Dr.Lakshmi Ravindran

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1.The Commissioner of Corporation Madras, Corporation Office, Chennai.

¶11

2.The Assistant Revenue Officer, Zone 15, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.120, Rajiv Gandhi Road (OMR), Shollinganallur, Chennai – 600 119. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent (Assistant Revenue Officer) in relating to letter dated 01.09.2021 in Ma.A./15/Va.Thoo.Na.Ka.No.R1/514/2021 and quash the same and direct the second respondent to change the name from Lakshmi Purushothaman to Lakshmi Ravindran in the tax receipt as per petitioner request dated 02.08.2021.

¶13

For Respondents : Ms.S.Vaitheeswari Standing Counsel

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Ms.S.Vaitheeswari, learned Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

¶17

This Writ Petition is allowed by directing the respondents to make appropriate corrections in the property tax assessment of the petitioner by changing the name of the petitioner as Dr.Lakshmi Ravindran from Dr.Lakshmi Purushothaman.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

This exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar (CCC)

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

arb

¶25

¶26

1.The Commissioner of Corporation Madras, Corporation Office, Chennai.

¶27

2.The Assistant Revenue Officer, Zone 15, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.120, Rajiv Gandhi Road (OMR), Shollinganallur, Chennai – 600 119.

¶28

+1cc to Ms.S.Vaitheeswari, Advocate SR. No. 66254

¶29

W.P.No.26243 of 2021

¶30

GSM (CO) PR (23/12/2021)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.Dr.Lakshmi Ravindran v. The Commissioner Corporation Madras

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Dr.Lakshmi Ravindran v. The Commissioner Corporation Madras

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Medical Research Foundation, Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

M/s.Beverly Hotel (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner

Tvl.Spilcare O Metaclen Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy Sales Tax Officer - I

M/s.Prime Alloys Vs The State Tax Officer (Inspection)

V.K. Electricals Vs The Tax Recovery officer

Shri Mahalingam Karthikeyan Vs The Income Tax Officer