Disposed

Thiruvallur Mavatta Pothu Thozhilalargal Sangam v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC9 Feb 2021WP/2597/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the Labour Department to consider a petition union's representation dated 18.01.2021 seeking an amendment to an arbitration reference to include certain workmen and dispose of it within four weeks, then disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to consider the representation dated 18.01.2021 and dispose of it within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Thiruvallur Mavatta Pothu Thozhilalargal… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 09.02.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶5

W.P.No.2597 of 2021

¶6

Thiruvallur Mavatta Pothu Thozhilalargal Sangam, Rep. by its General Secretary, Reg.No.96/TVR, No.17, Selai Road, Annamalai Nagar, Thiruvalluvar - 602 001.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Government of Tamilnadu,

¶10

Rep. by its Secretary, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶11

M/s.BGR Energy System Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman, 443, Annasalai, Teynampet,

¶12

Chennai - 600 018.

¶13

The President,

¶14

AIRFIN Cooler Division, BGR Energy System Ltd., No.443, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

¶15

The General Manager,

¶16

AIRFIN Cooler Division, BGR Energy System Ltd.,

¶17

No.9, GNT Road,

¶18

Panjetty Post, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District - 601 204. ... Respondents

¶19

PRAYER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to issue an amendment to the reference by removing the names of S.Balaji and Iyappan at Serial Nos.30 and 32 and by including the name of Jayapal and M.Nehru at Serial Nos.30 and 32 in the tabular column shown below the schedule of reference in G.O.(Pa) No.217, dated 16.04.2020; to prohibit the continuance of the lockout imposed by the respondents 2 to 4 with effect from 13.07.2019, from the date of reference as per sections 10(3) and 10(B)(b) of the

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

I.D.Act; to file a complaint under sections 26 and 31 against the respondents 2 to 4 and their officials or to authorize the petitioner union to file such a complaint as per Section 34(1) of the I.D.Act and to refer the dispute in Na.Ka.No.A/806/2019 relating to the charter of demands to the Industrial Tribunal, for adjudication as per section 12(1) r/w sections 10(1)(c) and 10(1)(d) of the I.D.Act, based on the representations dated 04.06.2020, 07.09.2020 and 18.01.2021 made by their union to the first respondent within a specified time limit as may be fixed by this Court.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajoy Khose

¶23

For Respondent No.1 : Mr.B.Anand

¶24

The petitioner/Union raised a dispute before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation)-2, Kuralagam, Chennai. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour has sent a failure report, based on which, the first respondent made the reference, in which, the names of the workmen viz., Jayapal and M.Nehru were not found and therefore, they seek amendment to the reference made by the first respondent and they have made the representation for that purpose on 18.01.2021.

¶25

Considering the limited prayer, a direction is issued to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.01.2021 and dispose of the same within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶29

//True Copy//

¶30

Sub Assistant Registrar

asi

1.The Secretary,

Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

+1cc to Mr.V.Ajoy Khose, Advocate SR.6958 +1cc to the Government Pleader SR.7346

¶37

W.P.No.2597 of 2021

¶38

VG II(CO) CB(03/03/2021)

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thiruvallur Mavatta Pothu Thozhilalargal Sangam v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thiruvallur Mavatta Pothu Thozhilalargal Sangam v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Sivalingam Vs The District Collector

N.Malarvannan Vs The Managing Director

M/s. Thiashola Estate Vs Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner

K.Perumal Vs Union of India

M/s. Asian Bearings Limited Vs The Regional Pf Commissioner

Tamil Nadu Generation & Vs The Regional Provident Fund