Allowed

M/s.Mohan Conductors v. The Commercial tax officer

Madras HC3 Dec 2021WP/25641/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to recover an original property document held by the respondent as security for a pending appeal. This Court, noting the document was retained since 2000, directed the respondent to return it within six weeks after registering a charge.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondent to return the original property document to the petitioner within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

M/s.Mohan Conductors Vs The Commercial tax officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶6

M/s.Mohan Conductors, Represented by Mr.Padam Chand Chordia, Proprietor, 163, Mint Street, Chennai – 79. ... Petitioner

¶7

The Commercial Tax Officer, Now designated as The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Sowcarpet I Assessment Circle, Earlier at 191, NSC Bose Road, Chennai – 1. Now at Integrated Commercial Tax Office Complex at North Chennai, Wall Tax Road, Chennai – 3. ... Respondent

¶8

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to return the original property document requested as per letter dated 18.10.2021.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Srikanth

¶10

For Respondent : Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a mandamus to direct the respondent to return original of the property document which was given as a security at the time when the petitioner had preferred an appeal against the Assessment Order dated 28.06.1996.

¶15

It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's appeal was partly allowed by the Appellate Commissioner by an order dated 21.06.2000.

¶16

It is further case of the petitioner that the respondent had preferred an appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench) and by an order dated 08.10.2003, the order of the Appellate Commissioner was set aside.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had thereafter filed writ petition before this Court in W.P.No.16686 of 2004. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the said writ petition was admitted and interim stay has been granted which was subsequently made absolute.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is pending disposal. It is submitted that there is an automatic security as far as the property of the petitioner is concerned and therefore the respondent should be directed to return the original property document which was deposited by the petitioner. In this connection, the petitioner has sent several representations which have not evoked any response from the respondent.

¶19

Considering the fact that the document is with the Department for a predominantly long period of time since 2000, pursuant to the said order of the Appellate Commissioner, this Writ Petition is disposed at the time of admission by directing the respondent to return the original property document to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after registering a charge against the property of the petitioner before the Jurisdictional Sub Registrar. This exercise shall be carried out by the respondent within the aforesaid period.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs.

¶22

SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶23

// TRUE COPY //

¶24

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

arb/nst

+1cc to Mr.V.Srikanth, Advocate Sr.63315 +1cc to the Special Government Pleader Sr.64178

¶29

W.P.No.25641 of 2021

¶30

gpl[co] srg 20/12/2021

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Mohan Conductors v. The Commercial tax officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Mohan Conductors v. The Commercial tax officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sir Ramaswami Mudaliar Higher Vs The Secretary

Thatha Elayalwar Chetty Vs The Commissioner

A.Padmanabhan Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

M/s. Shree Krishna Electricals Vs The State Tax Officer

M/s.Rajham Refineries Vs The State Tax Officer

M/s. Deepam Roadways Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St) Adjudication