Petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 challenging appointments as ward members. On hearing, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal, leading the court to dismiss the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.12.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.No.25622 of 2021
Gopal .. Petitioner Vs
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 29.09.2021 and consequently direct the 4th respondent to cancel the appointment of 6 and 7 respondents as 7th and 8th ward members in Aviyur Village Panchayat and conduct the election for the 7th and 8th Ward of the Aviyur Village Panchayat.
For the Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishna Moorthy For the Respondents : Mr.S.Sivashanmugam for 1st respondent
: Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 5
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar sasi To:
Gopal
The Chief Election Commissioner, State of Tamilnadu
State of Tamilnadu
Director of Directorate of Rural Development
District Collector, Villupuram
Thasildar, Gingee Taluk
MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
