Remanded

S.Subramaniam, v. The District Collector

Madras HC2 Dec 2021WP/25587/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the District Collector to consider a representation for grant of patta to a Temple or Deity. The court directed the first respondent to consider the representation after notice and hearing before passing orders on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2020 after issuing notice and providing opportunity of hearing, and pass orders within 12 weeks.

S.Subramaniam, Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 02.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.No.25587 of 2021

¶6

S. Subramaniam .... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Erode.

¶9

The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Endowment Board, Erode Region, Erode District.

¶10

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District.

¶11

The Tahsildar, Nambiyur Taluk, Erode District. .... Respondents

¶12

Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the

¶13

representation made by the petitioner along with the general public for grant of patta in the name of the Temple or Deity by considering the representation dated 18.10.2021.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.A. Sundaravadhanan

¶15

For R1, R3 & R4 : Mr.P. Baladhandayutham Special Government Pleader

¶16

For R2 : Mr.S.Yashwanth Additional Government Pleader

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner along with the general public for grant of patta in the name of the Temple or Deity by considering the representation dated 18.10.2021.

¶20

Heard, Mr.A. Sundaravadhanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.P. Baladhandayutham, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1, 3 & 4 and Mr.S.Yashwanth, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the second respondent.

¶21

Without going into the merits of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.11.2020, after issuance of notice to the petitioner and the counter parties, if any and after giving them an opportunity of hearing and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

Lpp

¶27

¶28

The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Erode.

¶29

The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Endowment Board, Erode Region, Erode District.

¶30

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

The Tahsildar, Nambiyur Taluk, Erode District.

¶33

+1cc to the Government Pleader, SR.No.63470, 63504

¶34

+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader(HR & CE), SR.No.63717

¶35

W.P.No.25587 of 2021

¶36

JPL(CO) CB(13/12/2021)

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Subramaniam, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Subramaniam, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayalakshmi Vs The Distirct Collector

M.E.Siddiqa Vs The Commissioner

M.Jamaludeen(Deceased) Vs The Government of

Palanisamy Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

M/S.v.Rangaswamy Naidu Vs State of T.N., Rep.by Secy.

Chakkravarthy, Vs State Rep. by the Inspector