Disposed

P.Janakai v. The District Collector

Madras HC30 Nov 2021WP/25419/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition seeks a direction for the Tahsildar to consider a request for modifying land measurement entries in specific patta records. The High Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioners' representation after notice and hearing within twelve weeks before disposing of the petition without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

The third respondent (Tahsildar) is directed to consider the petitioners' dated 22.09.2021 representation regarding modification of land measurement entries after issuing notice and holding hearings,

P.Janakai Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.11.2021

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶4

W.P.No.25419 of 2021

¶5

P.Janakai 2. S.Shanmugam 3. S.Chinnasamy ... Petitioners Vs 1. The District Collector, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Palladam, Tiruppur District. 4. K.G.Balasubramaniam 5. P.Senthilkumar 6. K.Chandrasekaran 7. C.Sivakami ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 22.09.2021 for making modification of land measurement entries in the patta bearing Numbers 1341, 596, 3012, 733, 597, 835, 595, 319, 162 and 331.

¶6

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Myilsamy For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader (for R1 to R3)

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

ORDER

¶9

This writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 22.09.2021 for making modification of land measurement entries in the patta bearing Numbers 1341, 596, 3012, 733, 597, 835, 595, 319, 162 and 331.

¶10

Considering the limited relief sought for in the petition, without expressing any opinion on merits of the writ petition, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 22.09.2021, after issuance of notice to the petitioners, the respondents 4 to 7 and counter parties, if any and after giving opportunity of hearing to them, pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶11

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed

¶12

of. No costs.

¶13

Sd/-

¶14

Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶15

//True Copy//

¶16

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶17

¶18

¶19

The District Collector,

¶20

Tiruppur,

¶21

Tiruppur District.

¶22

The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶23

Tiruppur,

¶24

Tiruppur District.

¶25

The Tahsildar,

¶26

Palladam,

¶27

Tiruppur District.

¶28

+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.NO. +1 cc to Mr.K.Myilsamy, Advocate Sr.NO. 62366

W.P.No.25419 of 2021

PL(CO)

A.SK(13.12.2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Janakai v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Janakai v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basheera Beevi Vs The Project Director

K.a.Gopinath Vs The Inspector General of Registration

R.Sathiyamoorthy Vs The District Collector

V.N.Natesan Vs The District Collector

A.Murthy Vs The Inspector General of

S.Baskaran Vs The District Collector