Disposed

R.Chellappan v. The District Magistrate and Collector

Madras HC14 Dec 2021WP/25388/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to stop the second respondent from taking possession of his residential premises. The court discharged the writ petition in favor of the petitioner allowing him to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal and permitted him to remove essential articles in the presence of the Bank representative.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal; petitioner allowed to remove essential articles in the presence of the Bank representative.

R.Chellappan Vs The District Magistrate and Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:14.12.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.P.No.25388 of 2021

¶7

R.Chellappan .. Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1 The District Magistrate and Collector Salem.

¶10

2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional office Salem.

¶11

3 The Authorized officer City Union Bank Administrative Office No.24B, Gandhi Nagar Kumbakonam - 612 001. .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus to forbear the 2nd respondent from in any manner attempting its take possession of the residential premises in Plot No.1/5, T.S.No.9/4 in 2nd Floor, Sri Krishna Residency, Chinnakrishnapuram, Salem pursuant to the notice dated 12.11.2021 of the 2nd Respondent in Na.Ka.No.5550/2016/A2.

¶13

For the Petitioner : Mr.B.Ravi Raja For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.R.Sivaraman for 3rd respondent

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

¶16

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to forbear the second respondent from in any manner attempting to

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

take possession of the residential premises in Plot No.1/5, T.S.No.9/4 in 2^nd Floor, Sri Krishna Residency, Chinnakrishnapuram, Salem pursuant to the notice dated 12.11.2021 of the second respondent.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to avail of the remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and, accordingly, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition. The only prayer is to allow him to take certain articles from the house, which are otherwise very essential to the petitioner.

¶20

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. In the meanwhile, the petitioner would be at liberty to take necessary articles from the house in the presence of a representative of the Bank. It may be a passport or any such document which has been required, to which no objection has been raised by learned counsel appearing for the Bank. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.26811 of 2021 is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

bbr

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

To:

¶27

1 The District Magistrate and Collector Salem.

¶28

2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional office Salem.

¶29

3 The Authorized officer City Union Bank, Administrative Office No.24B, Gandhi Nagar Kumbakonam - 612 001.

¶30

+2ccs to Mr.B.Raviraja, Advocate, S.R.No.66808,66828

¶31

+1cc to Government Pleader, in SR.No.67472 [08/04/2022]

W.P.No.25388 of 2021

BR(CO)

SU(15/12/2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Chellappan v. The District Magistrate and Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Chellappan v. The District Magistrate and Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Regional Manager Vs a.Anandhi

Tmt.L.Rani, Vs The District Collector

Accudyne Industries India Private Limited Vs M/S. R.P. Rajarajan Enterprises

M/S.Kaizer Trade Ventures Vs City Union Bank Ltd.

D.Ashok Kumar Vs the Director

G.Saravanan Vs M/S.Thilak International