Petitioner sought writ to regularize services as Games Marker and pay time scale from 1999. Court held petition infructuous as petitioner had discontinued employment with the respondent school on 29.09.2011.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 29.07.2021
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Writ Petition No.25343 of 2011 & M.P.No.1 of 2011
P.Rajasekaran .. Petitioner
vs.
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order of the 2nd Respondent in Na.Ka.No.1737/A4/07 dated 10.03.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner as Games Marker at 5th Respondent School and to pay time scale of pay from 01.09.1999 as per G.O.Ms.No.527, dated 30.12.1997 and absorb him as Office Assistant as per Government Letter No.235, dated 23.11.2006 and also as per letter of 1st Respondent in Na.Ka.No.07348-01-R8, dated 24.01.2007.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.C.Harsha Raj
(counsel for State) & R1 to R4
O R D E R
The Petitioner challenges an order dated 10.03.2011 of the second Respondent herein and consequently seeks regularization of his services as Games Marker in the fifth https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Respondent School.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Kal
To
Writ Petition No.25343 of 2011 & M.P.No.1 of 2011
SSV(CO) GN(10/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of the petitioner's discontinuation from service.
What is the appropriate disposal of the petition where the petitioner is no longer employed in the capacity sought to be regularized?
Whether any relief for regularization of service can be granted when the petitioner has discontinued employment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Rajasekaran
The Director of School Education
The Chief Educational Officer
The District Education Officer
The Regional Inspector of Physical Education
The Headmaster
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
