A writ petition for mandamus to unfreeze bank accounts was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner counsel submitted that their prayer had become infructuous before hearing.
Null; prayer dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.11.2021
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.No.23547 of 2017
Skylark Apartments Owners Association New No.6, Old No.13, Rutland Gate, 5th Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006. By its Secretary ...Petitioner Vs
State Bank of India (represented by its Chief Manager) Thousand Light Branch, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006. ...Respondents
Prayer Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, seeking to direct the respondent Bank to unfreeze and permit the Petitioner Association's duly authorised office bearers to operate the Bank Accounts Nos.10640566461 & 10640566450 maintained in the respondent Bank Branch.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rst
To:
The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Thousand Light Branch, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.
W.P.No.23547 of 2017
KG(CO) RGA(30/11/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Skylark Apartments Owners Association
State Bank of India
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
