Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Mr.a.Gopinath, Vs The District Collecor — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

Home
Madras HC
2021
Mr.a.Gopinath, Vs The District CollecorMr.a.Gopinath, v. The District Collecor

Dismissed

Mr.a.Gopinath, v. The District Collecor

Madras HC16 Feb 2021WP/23337/2017

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.02.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

W.P.Nos.23337, 23338 & 23339 of 2017 W.M.P.Nos.24430, 24431 & 24432 of 2017

Mr.A.Gopinath ... Petitioner in all WPs

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining, Office of the District Collector, Krishnagiri. ...Respondent in all WPs

PRAYER in W.P.No.23337: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, to forbear the respondents from in any way interfering with the petitioner's right to quarry and transport quarried mineral from the lease granted petitioner's patta land granite quarry measuring 0.20.5 Hec, comprised in S.F.Nos.408/2B, 0.66.5 Hec., in S.F.No.410/1A, 0.16.5 Hec., in S.F.No.420/1A, 0.25.0 Hec., in S.F.No.420/1B1 and 0.39.5 Hec., in S.F. No.421/2B, totally measuring 1.68.5 Hec., situated in Karandapalli Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District, during the currency of the lease granted in favour of the petitioner in respect of the subject quarry.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Mr. A. Gopinath
respondent
The District Collector, Krishnagiri District

Coram

AI extract

Abdul Quddhosse

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 16 Feb 2021 · February
Registered: 29 Aug 2017
Case no.: WP/23337/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Abdul Quddhose

C.R.Shankar Vs The Thasildar
15 Feb 2021
J.M.Edward Nadars and Company Vs Yes Bank Ltd.
15 Feb 2021
M.Suriyaprakash Vs The Commissioner
15 Feb 2021
R.Murugesan Vs The Sub Collector
16 Feb 2021

Cite this judgement

Mr.a.Gopinath, v. The District Collecor, WP/23337/2017 (MAD), decided on 16 February 2021.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Abdul Quddhosse

Parties & counsel

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

PRAYER in W.P.No.23338: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents from in any way interfering with the petitioner's right to quarry and transport quarried mineral from the lease granted petitioner's patta land granite quarry measuring 0.06.0 Hec, comprised in S.F.No.132/1A, 0.21.0 Hec., in S.F.No.132/B, 0.40.0 Hec., in S.F.No.132/1C and 0.09.0 Hec., in S.F.No.132/1D, totally measuring 0.76.0 Hec., situated in Karandapalli Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District, during the currency of the lease granted in favour of the petitioner in respect of the subject quarry.

PRAYER in W.P.No.23339: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of a writ of

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

mandamus, to direct the respondents from in any way interfering with the petitioner's right to quarry and transport quarried mineral from the lease granted from the government quarry lands, measuring 1.50 acres out of the total extent of 4.64.0 Hectares, Comprised in Survey No.463 (Part), 3.00 acres, out of the total extent of 1.96.0 Hectares in Survey No.464/4(Part) and 2.25 acres out of the total extent of 1.21.5 Hectares in Survey No.465/4, totally measuring 6.75 acres, situated in Agalakottah Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District, during the currency of the lease granted in favour of the petitioner in respect of the subject quarry.

For Petitioner in all WPs : Mr.K.Ramakrishna Reddy For Respondent in all WPs : Mr.E.Manoharan Special Government Pleader

COMMON ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has now become infructuous.

2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

pam

To

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining, Office of the District Collector, Krishnagiri.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 9537

W.P.Nos.23337, 23338 & 23339 of 2017

RGN(CO) GN(17/03/2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

CNR

HCMA011906222017

Topic

Property and Title

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

M.Balavenkatesan Vs The Indian Oil Corporation Limited

16 Feb 2021

S.Govindammal Vs the District Collector

16 Feb 2021