For want of prosecution by the petitioner who failed to appear, this high court dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 seeking cancellation of a sale deed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.2330 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.04.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.No.2330 of 2018
Thangaraj ... Petitioner
-Vs-
1 The Inspector General of
Registration No.100 Santhome High Road
Mylapore Chennai-28.
2 The District Registrar
O/o.The District Registrar Chengalpattu
Rajaji Street JCK Nagar Hanumanthai
Chengalpattu-603 001.
3 The Sub Registrar
O/o.The Sub Registrar Thiruporur No.29
South Mada Street Thiruporur-603 110.
4 Yasodha
5 Kumar
6 Elumalai
7 Kala
8 Thilaga
9. E. Karunakaran ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Directing the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the Sale
W.P.No.2330 of 2018
Deed dated 20.5.2011 in Document No.4678 of 2011 on the file of 3rd respondent in favour of the 9th respondent as per the representation of the petitioner dated 1.12.2017 within a stipulated time fixed by this Honourable Court and restore the property to the original status.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Purushothaman, Government Advocate -for RR 1 to 3 Mr.V.Premkumar, RR 4 to 9
O R D E R When this case came up for hearing on 23.04.2021, there was no representation
on behalf of the petitioner, hence, it was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. Accordingly, it is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today
also, when the case is called, none appeared for the petitioner. Since there is no
representation for the petitioner continuously, for want of prosecution, this writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
28.04.2021
tsvn/kst
W.P.No.2330 of 2018
To
W.P.No.2330 of 2018
R.SURESH KUMAR, J
tsvn
W.P.No.2330 of 2018
28-04-2021
Thangaraj
The Inspector General of Registration
The District Registrar
The Sub Registrar
Yasodha
Kumar
R. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
