Quashed

C.kaveriyammal v. the District Collector

Madras HC27 Oct 2021WP/23033/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, in this writ petition under Article 226, directed revenue respondents to consider and process the petitioner's representation for the grant of patta for land in Gundupatti, Krishnagiri District. The court ordered an adequate enquiry to be conducted within five months without opining on the merits of the application.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation for grant of patta and pass orders within five months.

C.kaveriyammal Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.10.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶5

W.P. No.23033 of 2021

¶6

C. Kaveriyammal, ... Petitioner

¶7

-Vs-

¶8

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Krishnagiri District.

¶9

The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District. Krishnagiri.

¶10

The Tahsildar, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for to issue Writ of Mandamus directing respondents herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.11.2020 for grant of patta to the petitioner for the land situated in Survey No.379/9 to an extent of 0.3 cents in No.1-32, Gundupatti, Pochampalli, Angampatti, Krishnagiri District after conducting adequate enquiry and pass appropriate orders accordingly.

¶12

For Petitioner :: Ms. T. Dharani For Respondents :: Mr. Yogesh Kannadasan (Government Advocate)

¶13

This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for to issue Writ of Mandamus directing respondents herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.11.2020 for grant of patta to the petitioner for the land situated in Survey No.379/9 to an extent of 0.3 cents in No.1-32, Gundupatti, Pochampalli, Angampatti, Krishnagiri District after conducting adequate enquiry and pass appropriate orders accordingly.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents as well as perused the material available on records. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Having considering the facts and circumstances of the

¶16

case and the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, it is seen that the petitioner seeks Patta in his favour in the aforesaid land on the ground that the respondents have formulated a scheme for assignment of "Grama Natham" land in favour of some eligible person and while most of the persons in petitioner village have been granted with Patta, the petitioner case was not considered so far. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the representation dated 26.11.2020 of the petitioner herein in order to grant Patta in her name and pass appropriate orders within a period of five months from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law after perusing the revenue records.

¶17

In the result, the Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed if any. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)

¶20

//True copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

Lbm

¶23

To:

¶24

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Krishnagiri District.

¶25

The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District. Krishnagiri.

¶26

The Tahsildar, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

¶27

+1cc to Mr.T. Dharani, Advocate SR.No.56136

¶28

+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.56216 W.P. No.23033 of 2021 BP(CO)

¶29

GMY(24/01/2022)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.kaveriyammal v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.kaveriyammal v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gubendra Vs The Commissioner for Land Administration

M.Rajendran Vs The District Collector

E.Suryaprasath Vs The Tahsildar

P.Sasikala Vs The District collector

G.Kala Vs the Tahsildar

C.Thilak Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer