Disposed

Alagusundaram v. The District Collector

Madras HC27 Oct 2021WP/23002/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, sitting in a single-judge bench, entertained a writ petition under Article 226. The petitioner sought a direction for the revenue authorities to correct an incorrect UDR Patta entry in his name. The Court directed the respondents to consider the representation and pass orders within 16 weeks without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation of 06.10.2021 and pass appropriate orders within sixteen weeks.

Alagusundaram Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.10.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶5

W.P. No.23002 of 2021

¶6

Alagusundaram, ...Petitioner

¶7

-Vs-

¶8

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

¶9

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri Krishnagiri District.

¶10

The Tahsildar, Kattiganapalli Village, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

¶11

Narasimman ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.10.2021 and pass appropriate orders accordingly.

¶13

For Petitioner :: Mr. V. Sakkarapani

¶14

For Respondents :: Mr. Yogesh Kannadasan (Government Advocate)

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.10.2021 and pass appropriate orders accordingly.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents as well as perused the material available on records.

¶19

Having considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, it is seen that the petitioner's wife purchased the property in S.No.256/1A, measuring an extent of 2 cents situated at Polupalli Village, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. The petitioner's wife died in the accident and the petitioner and his children are in the possession and enjoyment of the said property. On verifying, it was found that UDR Patta for the property of the petitioner was wrongly mentioned in the name of one Narasimman. Hence, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 06.10.2021 requesting the respondents to cancel the wrong entry in the UDR Patta in the name of M.Narasimman and to issue patta in his name. The respondents have neither sent any reply nor taken any action on his representation. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the representation dated 06.10.2021 of the petitioner herein and pass appropriate orders within a period of Sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law after perusing the revenue records.

¶20

In the result, the Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed if any. There shall be no order as to costs.

s/d-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶25

Lbm

¶26

To:

¶27

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri Krishnagiri District.
3. The Tahsildar,
Kattiganapalli Village, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
+1 CC to Mr.V.Sakkarapani, Advocate sr 55223.
+1 CC to The Government Pleader sr 56215.
W.P. No.23002 of 2021
GSM(CO)
SP(16/12/2021)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Alagusundaram v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alagusundaram v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gubendra Vs The Commissioner for Land Administration

M.Rajendran Vs The District Collector

E.Suryaprasath Vs The Tahsildar

P.Sasikala Vs The District collector

G.Kala Vs the Tahsildar

C.Thilak Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer