M.C.Subramaniam, v. The Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The high court dismissed a writ petition for being infructuous because the cinema theater, which was the subject matter of the petition, had been demolished.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P. No.22978 of 2015
M.C.Subramaniam .. Petitioner
Vs.
- The Collector, Erode District, Perundurai Road, Erode 638 011.
- The Revenue Divisional Officer, Erode Town, Erode District 638 001.
- The Tashildar, Perundurai Taluk, Perundurai 638 052, Erode District.
- The Executive Engineer, PWD, Buildings and Maintenance Division, Collectorate Office Campus, Perundurai Road, 638 011.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.07.2015 in accordance with law, within a time frame as may be fixed by this court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.C.Subramaniam
- respondent
The Collector, Erode District
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Erode Town
- respondent
The Tashildar, Perundurai Taluk
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, PWD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court