Disposed

A.Jayalakshmi v. The Member Secretary

Madras HC26 Oct 2021WP/22838/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus directing the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) to issue a Development Rights Certificate in lieu of compensation for her acquired land, similar to orders granted to neighboring landowners. The Court directed CMDA to consider the petitioner's representation and decide on merits with a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders on merits with an opportunity of hearing within 12 weeks.

A.Jayalakshmi Vs The Member Secretary — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 26.10.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶5

W.P.No.22838 of 2021

¶6

A. Jayalakshmi ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

¶9

The Divisional Engineer (H) C & M, Chennai City Road Division, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

¶10

The Land Acquisition Officer/, The Special Tahsildar (L.A.), Chennai - Unit, Collectorate, Chennai - 600 001. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.09.2021 and to issue Development Rights Certificate to the petitioner for the acquisition of his lands in S.Nos.332/5 and 332/9 measuring 10 cents Velachery Village, Chennai acquired for the purpose of formation of Southern Sector of Inner Ring Road, Velachery to the similarly placed neighboring land owners Mrs.Vijayalakshmi Narayanan, Mr.T.N.Chandrashekar and Mr.T.N.Ramakrishnan in D.R.C.No.027/2015 dated 03.07.2015 by complying/obeying the judgment made in W.P.No.28744 of 2014 dated 30.03.2015 by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. S.Sivaraman

¶13

For Respondents : Mrs.Malarvizhi Udhayakumar Standing Counsel for R1

¶14

Mr. V.Veluchamy Government Advocate for R3

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The relief sought in this Writ Petition is to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.09.2021 and issue Development Rights Certificate to her, for the acquisition of her lands measuring 10 cents situated in Survey No.332/4 and 332/6, Velachery Village, Chennai, for the purpose of formation of Southern Sector of Inner Ring Road, Velachery, Phase-I in lieu of compensation, as issued to the similarly placed neighbouring Land Owners viz., Vijayalakshmi Narayanan, T.N.Chandrashekar and T.N.Ramakrishnan in D.R.C.No.1/2010 dated 03.07.2015, pursuant to the order of this Court dated 30.03.2015 in W.P.No.28744 of 2014.

¶18

It is the case of the petitioner that she is the owner of the land comprised in S.Nos.332/4 and 332/6 as per Patta No.4950 New T.S.No.332/9, measuring to an extent of 27 cents (11760) sq.ft. situated at Velachery Village, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai, through sale deed bearing Doc.No.380 of 1985 dated 28.03.1985. From the date of purchase, she has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. While so, the third respondent after following due formalities, acquired an extent of 10 cents from the petitioner's land for the purpose of formation of Southern Sector of Inner Ring Road, Velachery Phase I. Thereafter, the District Collector passed an Award bearing No.01/2010 dated 31.08.2010, fixing compensation for the acquired land belonging to the petitioner and also deposited the same before the Civil Court under Section 22(3) of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, which was not received by the petitioner till date.

¶19

It is the further case of the petitioner that her neighbouring land owners viz., Vijayalakshmi Narayanan, T.N.Chandrashekar and T.N.Ramakrishnan, who are the similarly placed persons like that of the petitioner and whose lands are also covered in the same Award No.1/2010, were issued with Development Rights Certificate by the CMDA in lieu of compensation amount, pursuant to the order of this Court dated 30.03.2015 in W.P.No.28744 of 2014. Hence, the petitioner filed IA.No.2 of 2021 to restore LAOP No.116 of 2012 filed by the Referring Authority, which was closed, for want of service on her. During the pendency of the said application, she made a representation dated 15.09.2021 to the first respondent with a copy marked to the second respondent, requesting to issue Development Rights Certificate, in lieu of compensation awarded for her acquired land. Finding no response on the said representation, she has come up with this writ petition for the aforesaid relief.

¶20

4.Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by order dated 20.09.2021 passed by the VI Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai, the application filed by the petitioner was allowed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and the reference in LAOP.No.116 of 2012 was reopened for

¶21

fresh consideration. The learned counsel further submitted that though the first respondent received the representation of the petitioner dated 26.03.2021 for the relief as stated in this writ petition, he did not take any action, till date. Hence, the learned counsel prayed for appropriate direction to the first respondent in this regard.

¶22

5.On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent fairly submitted that the first respondent would consider the representation of the petitioner and pass orders, on merits, within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court.

¶23

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.09.2021 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

7.This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)

¶27

//True copy//

¶28

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶29

sp/msm To

¶30

The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

¶31

The Divisional Engineer (H) C & M, Chennai City Road Division, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

¶32

The Land Acquisition Officer/, The Special Tahsildar (L.A.), Chennai - Unit, Collectorate, Chennai - 600 001.

¶33

+1cc to Mr.S.Sivaraman, Advocate SR.No.55334

¶34

W.P.No.22838 of 2021

¶35

NMI(CO)

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ GMY(26/11/2021)

A.Jayalakshmi v. The Member Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Jayalakshmi v. The Member Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Raman Vs Inspector General of Registration

Pandian Vs the State Rep.by

R.Ranagnathan Vs The District Collector

R.Kalaiselvan Vs The Chief Manager

A.Balaji Vs The District Collector

V.Sundar Vs Revenue and Disaster Management Department