Allowed

N.K.Nandhagopal v. Assistant Commissioner (St)

Madras HC29 Oct 2021WP/22785/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Writ Court allowed the petitioner's petition challenging the attachment of his property for alleged company dues. The Court held that without liquidation or misfeasance, attaching a private limited company director's property for the company's tax liabilities is not sustainable.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 14.06.2018 is set aside. No order as to costs.

N.K.Nandhagopal Vs Assistant… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 29.10.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶5

W.P.NO.22785 OF 2021 & WMP.NO.24008 OF 2021

¶6

Mr. N.K.Nandhagopal ... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

Assistant Commissioner (ST) North Circle, Tirupur 2. The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Ezhilagam, Chepauk Chennai - 600 005. 3. TCS Textiles Private Limited No.68, College Road Tirupur. ...Respondents

¶9

Prayer:

¶10

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned proceedings vide Ma.ku.Va.Sa 33482303238/2018 dated 14.06.2018 and quash the same and direct the First Respondent to lift the encumbrance registered upon the property situated at Survey Nos. 261/3, 261/4 and 261/5 (totalling to 6 acres and 34 cents), Pachapalayam Village, Kangayam Taluk, Vellakovil Sub-registry, Tirupur.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. Adithya Reddy For Respondent : Ms. Amirta Dinakaran Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Ms. Sri Harini for R3

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing on 28.10.2021, which reads as follows:

¶15

'Mr.Adithya Reddy, learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that vide impugned order dated 14.06.2018, the writ petitioner's (natural personindividual) property has been attached for alleged dues of the company in which he is a director, but the company is pursuing a challenge to levy vide W.A.No.195 of 2020 and a Hon'ble Division Bench is in seizin of the matter.

¶16

Ms.Amirta Dinakaran, learned Revenue counsel who accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 & 2 (official respondents) requests for time to get instructions and revert to this Court.

¶17

Registry to show the name of learned Revenue counsel in the cause list from next listing.

¶18

4. List under the cause list caption 'ADJOURNED ADMISSION' tomorrow i.e., on 29.10.2021.'

¶19

2. Mr.Adithya Reddy, learned counsel for writ petitioner and Ms.Amirta Dinkaran, learned Revenue counsel for Respondents 1 and 2 (official respondents) are before this Court. Mr.C.Sri Harini, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of third respondent.

¶20

3. This Court, with the consent of all the aforementioned learned counsel, takes up the main writ petition as it turns on a very narrow compass. Adverting to earlier proceedings dated 28.10.2021, learned Revenue counsel submits that the factual position projected by learned counsel for writ petitioner is not disputable, but nonetheless as some security was required, the attachment had been made.

¶21

4. In the considered view of this Court, the above argument cannot be sustained as the assessee is a company i.e., a juristic person. To be noted, it is a private limited company.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

Absent liquidation, malfeasance or misfeasance, the question of attaching the properties of a Director (natural person) will not arise. There is no disputation or disagreement regarding this proposition. Therefore, captioned writ petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 14.06.2018 is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

gpa

¶29

¶30

Assistant Commissioner (ST) North Circle, Tirpur

¶31

The Principal Secretary and Commissioner

¶32

of Commercial Taxes

¶33

Ezhilagam, Chepauk Chennai - 600 005.

¶34

+1cc to Mr. Adithya Reddy, Advocate, S.R.No.56407

¶35

+1cc to the Special Government Pleader, (Taxes)S.R.No.56791

¶36

W.P.No.22785 of 2021 & WMP.No.24008 of 2021

¶37

KSM(CO) PM/22/11/2021

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.K.Nandhagopal v. Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.K.Nandhagopal v. Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.K.Mohan, Vs The Principal Secretary to

Sri Lakshmi Balaji Enterprises Vs The State Tax officer

Sri Lakshmi Balaji Enterprises Vs The State Tax officer

Thavathiru.T.Mani Sathu Vs The Commissioner

Thavathiru.T.Mani Sathu Vs The Commissioner

Raju Sugumaran Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax